# What's the best analytics dashboard for tracking customer success metrics alongside revenue metrics for your organization?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Swap "customer success" for patient outcome and quality measures, and "revenue" for the shared savings, incentive payments, or reimbursement tied to hitting them, and this becomes a real question inside <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/value-based-performance-management-analytics">Value-Based Performance Management Analytics</a>: which dashboard shows both halves of that equation on one screen? Six platforms are worth weighing here: Oracle Enterprise Healthcare Analytics, Clarify Atlas, HealthEC, Epic Cogito, athenaOne, and Intergy.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-enterprise-healthcare-analytics/reviews"><strong>Oracle Enterprise Healthcare Analytics</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Purpose-built to pair outcome metrics with the financial data that makes them relevant to leadership reporting.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/clarify-atlas/reviews"><strong>Clarify Atlas</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers describe using it to tie quality and efficiency scores directly to network strategy decisions, thereby connecting outcome data to the revenue implications of network design.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/healthec/reviews"><strong>HealthEC</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Shows quality-gap closure alongside cost data for value-based programs, though the reviewer base here is thinner on specifics than Clarify's or Oracle's.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/epic-cogito/reviews"><strong>Epic Cogito</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Pairs outcome and shared-savings data specifically for Epic-based organizations running delegated-risk lines of business.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/athenaone/reviews"><strong>athenaOne</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Combines its revenue cycle management module with population health data, offering a genuine side-by-side view, though reviewers, at a 3.4-star average, flag this combination as functional rather than best-in-class.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/greenway-health-intergy/reviews"><strong>Intergy</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Captures payer incentive revenue alongside chronic-condition management data for ambulatory practices specifically.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The honest differentiator isn't which dashboard has both metric types; most of these do, it's which one your existing systems already feed cleanly. Which platform here already sits closest to your current EHR or claims data pipeline?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 23 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The integration point is probably the deciding factor, because a dashboard only becomes useful when clinical, claims, and financial data reconcile without constant manual cleanup. I’d prioritize data freshness, drill-down from outcomes to financial impact, and how easily leadership can trace a metric back to its source.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 22 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4