# What's the best AML software for automating sanctions screening and ongoing transaction monitoring at scale?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2, we're processing enough transaction volume now that manual sanctions checks and alert reviews aren't sustainable, and I'm trying to find <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/anti-money-laundering">AML software</a> that actually automates screening and monitoring rather than just adding another dashboard for analysts to babysit. What's held up once volume gets real?</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/complyadvantage/reviews"><strong>ComplyAdvantage</strong></a>: reviewers highlight fast, reliable risk intelligence for sanctions and adverse media screening, with ongoing monitoring cutting down a lot of the manual work in onboarding and review, though a few mention the initial configuration takes effort and false positives still need attention.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sumsub/reviews"><strong>Sumsub</strong></a>: reviewers describe covering KYC onboarding, AML screening, PEP screening, and sanctions screening in one platform, with one user noting it halved their manual review workload since transactions are constantly monitored automatically.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/flagright/reviews"><strong>Flagright</strong></a>: reviewers point to no-code rule building for transaction monitoring and watchlist screening, letting compliance teams adjust detection logic themselves instead of waiting on engineering, with an AI copilot feature reviewers say cuts real time off name-screening tasks.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams running this at real volume, how much manual review are you still doing after automating screening, and has anyone gotten false positive rates down without constantly tuning the rules by hand?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The number I’d want after automation is analyst minutes per genuinely actionable alert. A system can reduce raw alert volume and still leave the team with expensive investigations if the remaining cases lack useful context. I’d replay a representative transaction set through each platform, then compare false positives, analyst touches, rule changes required, and whether tuning one noisy pattern creates blind spots somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4