# What do frontline sales reps actually want from a sales training platform versus what sales enablement managers tend to prioritize when selecting one?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">This question sits at the center of most failed training platform rollouts in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-training-and-onboarding"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-training-and-onboarding">sales training and onboarding</a> category. The person selecting the tool optimizes for accountability and analytics, the person using the tool optimizes for speed and low friction, and the resulting adoption gap makes the investment worthless. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What reps optimize for: Mobile Support, Video Simulations, Gamification:</strong></p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/smartwinnr/reviews"><strong>SmartWinnr</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Training accessible between calls on any device, interactive practice that doesn't feel like passive watching, and engagement mechanics that make completing modules feel worth doing. Reps don't evaluate whether the manager dashboard is detailed enough; they evaluate whether the platform fits into how they actually spend their day.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/awarathon/reviews"><strong>Awarathon</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Best for video simulations — the feature reps most consistently credit for making training feel like genuine skill development rather than content consumption. The ability to practice realistic sales scenarios without the consequence of a real customer encounter is what reps describe as the most valuable training activity. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/symtrain/reviews"><strong>Symtrain</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Provides the combination of interactive practice and live coaching sessions that reps consistently describe as more engaging than self-paced video modules. The simulation environment makes practice feel consequential rather than perfunctory, which is the gap that passive video never closes.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What enablement managers optimize for: Manager Portals, Assessments, Certifications:</strong></p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/aspireship/reviews"><strong>Aspireship</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Provides the accountability visibility layer that managers need to distinguish reps who are genuinely developing from those who are completing requirements without engaging. Managers don't evaluate whether the gamification is motivating enough; they evaluate whether they can prove to leadership that the training investment is producing measurable skill development.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cockpit/reviews"><strong>Cockpit</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Provides the combination of top-tier assessment capability and CRM connectivity that gives managers the accountability data they need, connected to the deal performance systems where the results actually show up.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that have rolled out a platform, did rep adoption end up being the bottleneck, or was it manager usage of the analytics layer? And has the gap between what got selected and what got used caused you to change anything about how you evaluate platforms now?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Feels like reps care about whether it helps them in the moment, managers care about whether it’s trackable. That gap shows up pretty quickly if the tool leans too much one way. If reps don’t find it useful day to day, it just becomes something they complete, not something they use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to ask you: have you seen anything that reps actually go back to on their own without being asked?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4