# What are the key features and capabilities of UKG Marketplace solutions that teams should evaluate to identify the best fit for their organisation?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hoping the people here who evaluate UKG Marketplace tools can pressure-test this list. I'm trying to pin down the key features and capabilities teams should evaluate in<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ukg-marketplace"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ukg-marketplace">UKG Marketplace</a> solutions to find the best fit for their organisation. My working criteria, with an example for each:</p><ul>
<li>
<strong>Integration depth.</strong> Is it a real UKG connector or just a login page? For instance,<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/joynd/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/joynd/reviews"><strong>Joynd</strong></a> exists purely to wire HR vendors together.</li>
<li>
<strong>Compliance paperwork.</strong> Published audits beat badges.<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-netsuite/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-netsuite/reviews"><strong>NetSuite</strong></a> lists its SOC and ISO audits publicly, which shortens security review.</li>
<li>
<strong>Review evidence.</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/salary-com-salary-com/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/salary-com-salary-com/reviews"><strong>Salary.com</strong></a> has real volume behind its G2 rating. Plenty of names in this category have one review or none, which is a data point in itself.</li>
<li>
<strong>Scope fit.</strong> Single-job tools versus platforms. A 5.0 on a handful of reviews is a different signal than a 4.3 on two thousand.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of these criteria actually predicts a good fit a year in, and which one is evaluation theater? And what would you add that I've missed?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Your criteria are a strong starting point. I&#39;d add two that often matter just as much over time: the quality of ongoing vendor support and how upgrades are handled, since both have a bigger impact on long-term success than feature checklists alone. Review volume is useful context, but it shouldn&#39;t outweigh fit for your specific workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4