# LogicGate vs Workiva for a risk team that wants a modern, configurable ERM setup without needing to hire a consultant to customize it?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m comparing LogicGate vs Workiva for a risk team that wants a modern, configurable ERM setup without needing to hire a consultant to customize it. Both show up often in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/enterprise-risk-management-erm"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/enterprise-risk-management-erm">enterprise risk management (ERM)</a> category, but they seem to solve different problems.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/logicgate-risk-cloud/reviews"><strong>LogicGate Risk Cloud</strong></a> seems better suited for teams that want configurable ERM workflows. Reviewers describe it as no-code and flexible, with internal teams able to adjust workflows themselves. The main caveat is that workflow building can take time to learn.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews"><strong>Workiva</strong></a> seems stronger when risk data needs to connect with SOX, certifications, disclosure, or financial reporting. Its linked data model is the differentiator, but it may be broader than needed for teams mainly looking for ERM workflow configuration.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Two adjacent options also seem worth noting:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/onspring/reviews"><strong>Onspring</strong></a>: Reviewers often mention self-service workflow changes, reporting, and form management.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sai360/reviews"><strong>SAI360</strong></a>: Useful for connected risk, compliance, and SOX workflows, with some learning curve upfront.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that evaluated LogicGate and Workiva, did the decision come down to workflow flexibility, reporting depth, cost, or internal admin capacity?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

To be honest for configure-it-yourself ERM workflows, I&#39;d go LogicGate. If it&#39;s reporting you actually care about, Workiva wins. What&#39;s the real use case for you?

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 27 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4