What I like most about Willo Video Interviewing is how intuitive and easy it is to set up and navigate. The platform makes it simple to create interview workflows quickly, which is especially valuable in fast-paced recruiting environments. From a campus recruiting perspective, it’s been particularly effective.we’re able to gather a high volume of candidate responses efficiently, and candidates consistently share positive feedback about their experience. Overall, it streamlines the process for both recruiters and candidates while maintaining a strong user experience Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area for improvement with Willo Video Interviewing is the assessment setup. It can feel too basic and lacks the level of structure needed for more comprehensive evaluations. For roles that require deeper screening or standardized scoring, the platform could benefit from more advanced customization options, such as structured assessment frameworks, weighted scoring, or more robust evaluation criteria. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using Willo, our phone screens typically lasted 20 to 30 minutes, and sometimes stretched to 30 or even 45 minutes when candidates had difficulty being concise. After these calls, interviewers would write up feedback for the rest of the hiring team to review.

With Willo, we've saved significant time by limiting candidate responses to 2-3 minutes per question. Willo enables later interviewers to watch the recorded videos, giving them a chance to observe candidates' communication skills firsthand and feel more confident about who they'll be meeting. It has allowed others to speak into hiring decisions to make a more confident hire. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish there was an easier way to edit interview questions. It doesn't feel user friendly to have to go through multiple pages before/after editing just to change a single question. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Willo works really well for us mainly as a candidate screening tool. It’s super easy for applicants to use since they just click a link and record their answers, which helps keep completion rates high and removes a lot of scheduling back-and-forth. On our side, the interface is clean and simple, so reviewing responses is quick and straightforward, especially for early-stage screening. It integrates with some ATS tools, which is helpful, though not super extensive if you’re running a more complex system. Performance-wise, it does exactly what we need for screening, but reviewing videos can still take time as volume grows. Pricing feels reasonable for the value it brings, especially in saving recruiter time during the initial stages. Onboarding was quick, and support has been solid whenever needed. The AI features like transcripts and summaries are nice to have, but overall we still rely on human judgment to make screening decisions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I personally dislike about Willo (especially when using it for candidate screening) is that it can feel a bit limited once you get past the basics. Reviewing candidates is straightforward, but it still requires a lot of manual effort since there’s no strong AI-driven ranking or deeper insights to quickly surface the best fits. The integrations are also somewhat restricted, so it doesn’t always flow seamlessly with more complex ATS setups. On top of that, as volume grows, going through each video one by one can get time-consuming, and the analytics side is fairly basic if you’re trying to make more data-driven hiring decisions. It does the core job well, but it doesn’t really go beyond screening into anything more intelligent or automated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Willo Video Interviewing to be easy to use both for the candidates and ourselves. It's a safe platform that helps candidates share their image with more trust, solving an important part of the hiring process. I also like that we can always download content and find the platform very intuitive. The initial setup was pretty easy as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think it should have more options and not only rejected/approved. But for us, sometimes we need to send more materials and we need to use another platform to do it. Also we don't have the option to put the candidate in an intermediate stage, for example 'in progress', or 'waiting for decision', something like that. The search could be improved. Currently, the system doesn't recognize variations in accentuation, if a name is registered as 'Laís', searching for 'Lais' returns no results. It would be important for the search to be more flexible, considering common typing variations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most about Willo Video Interviewing is the combination of simplicity, efficiency, and intuitive experience, both for recruiters and candidates. The flow is very clear, with quick setup of interviews. I like the ability to customize questions and the ease of reviewing and rating the videos. The practicality and clarity of the system really make the process more strategic, agile, and consistent. The initial setup was quite simple and intuitive, with a clear onboarding flow, which allows any member to start using the tool quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be valuable to have broader integrations with ATS or more robust automation options, which would allow further centralization of the process steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Willo Video Interviewing really easy to use, and it's received well across the business when we've shared links for people to review tests. It's just a really useful piece of kit. I also enjoy working with their customer service team because they solve issues quickly. Additionally, the initial setup was very easy, and their team helped a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We would love to see more options for testing. If we were able to use the platform for both video interviewing and test, it would allow us to get rid of other technologies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Willo interview screening is particularly helpful for saving time and creating a fair, consistent shortlisting process. Its asynchronous video interviews allow candidates to respond at a time that suits them, while hiring teams can review answers collaboratively and on their own schedule. For businesses, this significantly reduces early‑stage screening time, removes scheduling bottlenecks, and ensures every candidate is assessed against the same structured questions, supporting better and more objective hiring decisions at scale Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback of Willo Video Interviewing is that it can feel less personal than live interviews, particularly for candidates who value real‑time interaction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Willo Video Interviewing is very easy to configure and build assessments with different question types, which is great for our recruitment teams. The ability to add company branding is a nice touch, and the candidate experience is good as well. It's quick and easy to set up for various roles, allowing us to assess a variety of skill types without any issues for candidates. The integration with Pinpoint ATS was very easy and hassle-free. I also find it easy to build in questions and settings, add assessment descriptions, and record videos if needed. Customizing the communications for invites, reminders, and completions is straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The scoring capability is currently limited to certain question types. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the simple and intuitive interface, the ease of setting up interviews, and the smooth experience for both recruiters and candidates. The ease of working in kanban and having a clear view of the funnel helps make tracking applications much more organized, allowing for quick and well-informed decisions. The platform is very functional and meets our current needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are few areas for improvement; what I see as an improvement would be to further expand the customization options for interviews and workflows. Additional automation resources and more detailed reports would help gain even more efficiency in the process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the convenience of Willo Video Interviewing. The transcripting tool is the most accurate one I've seen, which is really beneficial for me, especially since I sometimes struggle with auditory processing. Also, it's very easy to use. The setup was super easy and didn't involve much, which I found very convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We don't use video. We only use audio because we have found that candidates don't really like the one way video format, but they are more willing to do written and audio responses. So I'm not sure that's really something that Willo can improve. I think it's just a public perception issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.