
What I like best is how granular and trustworthy the seed data is. We run deliverability for several clients on separate sending domains, and Warmy shows inbox, promotions and spam placement for each sender on its own instead of one blended number. When a client asks why their numbers moved, I can answer for their program specifically. The API is a big plus too. We pull seed stats straight into our client dashboards and monthly reports, so nobody has to copy numbers off a screen. I trust the data enough to put it in front of clients every month, and that’s the highest compliment I can give a deliverability tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Honestly, not much. My main wish is clearer API documentation. Filtering stats by sender works well once it’s set up, but if a filter is formatted slightly wrong, the API quietly returns data for every sender combined instead of giving an error. That took some trial and error to figure out. It’s also worth knowing that seed opens keep coming in for a few weeks after a send, so last month’s numbers keep changing for a while. That makes sense once you understand it, but I’d love a clear note in the dashboard showing when a month’s data is final. Neither one stops me from recommending Warmy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.


