UX Pilot AI Reviews & Product Details

Great for inspiration and quick ideation, but too much work (like all other AI's) to create a real end-product that's ready to market. That's however not the best use-case. Provide a good prompt and it can help you greatly visualise the product you envision. A lot better (at this moment) than the majority of competitors, including Figma Make itself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The page and project limit for paid accounts is restricted to just five projects, which feels quite limiting. Additionally, I haven't found a straightforward way to export or temporarily archive projects. While the 'variations' feature could be useful, it's disappointing that you can't attach a prompt for the variation to include. Also they're not transparent and honest about their actual reviews. Some pages say 70K and others 300K. In reality it might be just 10K. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love UX Pilot AI for its ability to create a variety of UI types and styles in just a minute, making the process of generating mockups incredibly efficient. This tool is especially proficient in designing desktop websites where it excels in creating layouts that can be easily reused across multiple pages by utilizing the reference function. I appreciate how quickly it can produce quality mockups that typically require only minimal fine-tuning. Additionally, the initial setup was very straightforward and easy, allowing me to integrate it into my workflow without any hassle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the speed of generating UI in UX Pilot AI to be problematic, as the wait time is quite long. It often interrupts my workflow when there's an error, especially after waiting for so long, stopping the mockup generation process. Additionally, the mobile app UI generation is not up to the standard I expect. It tends to create Android apps UI or mobile web UI but lacks the capability to produce iOS app layouts, which limits my design options. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It help me and my manager to create first draft ideas before we start to design. We have a new SaaS app that we are building and we used to struggle number of times when we used to find ideas online. Now we just prompt and we have at least 60-80% idea of what we want to build. Then I take that design to figma and chage it where we need when it come to other components that we have already. I like how easy is to implement all of the design back to figma with just one click copy paste. We use this app quite frequent now as we saw it evolve much more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The component stuff is not working like I was thinking to be honest. We wanted to feed all of the complex components that we had already to help us used those as patterns for future references but in most cases its like changing them quite a lot but its not loosing some of the core features. It will be amazing if can only use the font styles that I created instead of me prompting again to add them. You can test with our component to make this build the code but it will be amazing if you could choose what kind of code to export like for example we need simple hmtl pages build with tailwind css and ready for livewire / php components structure. That will be something amazing if we could integrate with visual studio code to get the page there in code and edit them and learn from that and build our /css pages and other pages together as plugin not just in figma but in visual studio code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Below this app, concept designs were slow and relied on designers to support the concept design work that allowed us to run discovery and test the principle further with customers and internal stakeholders. This meant the number of features we were able to validate was limited per given period. This change because I can now put designs together that are not only great for discovery and wireframe testing but actually come really close to the final product, thanks to the ability to import your own design files and have that as a baseline. So these mockups are in the style of our current platform. The prompting and level of controls - how deep of a design you want - are simple and easy to use. Couple this with the fact we can easily integrate it into Figma and import the designs mean we can take it from concept to finished design very easily. This is one of the smoothest implementation we've seen around.

With all this, the way it handles versioning, if you add or change a design or parts of it makes tracking and referring back very useful. You can change whole pages (global) or sections of the design, as well as manually. The manual option is great if you have design know-how or simply just want to correct some wording, which does not use up any of your credits. Love this touch!

I have been able to turn around stakeholder buy-ins who has often struggle to understand a feature conceptually and needed to wait for designs just to iterate on in the past, now can work with me with live changes as they suggest feedback. We have significantly reduced our time from design concept to accepted final approval by 70-80%. We have gone from weeks down to days for this. Such a huge win for us, especially as a startup where time and resource is so limited. It has not become part of everyday product management and not only am I frequently using this, it is being planned to roll this out to other parts of the tech team to benefit from as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The new UI/UX took a little getting used to where they moved the option for flows. It wasn't immediately obvious the controls on the design depth - deep design or wireframe was until you expanded the prompt entry window, then you see everything. Fine once you know but with the switch to way you navigate that feature was confusing. You should see the options in the small window on the left without having to open to a larger window first.

Overall though, nothing negative to say. It has worked well, easily and smoothly! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the way it works and understands the requirements you give it very well. I must admit the fact that, at the beginning, I conducted an analysis of the sites I wanted to base myself on, to thoroughly understand what my client required and what was needed to achieve it. I also refined my instructions with an AI like ChatGPT to clarify and better shape the instructions, which worked very well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Perhaps there isn't much usage documentation on this, and figuring out what comes after generating your first screen can be confusing. Additionally, some options like section editing still require refining the original context, and I repeat, there isn't much help on how to do this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UX Pilot AI shines because it turns messy ideas into clean, structured wireframes in seconds, cutting out the slow guesswork and giving you a clear blueprint to build from. It doesn’t just draw boxes; it understands page flow, hierarchy, CTAs, and user intent, so the output actually feels like thoughtful UX instead of auto-generated noise. The speed, consistency, and clarity it brings make it easier to focus on refining the experience rather than wrestling with where to start. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It tends to lose or break existing interactive elements (hover states, transitions, clickable flows) when you duplicate a page and then tweak parts of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the possibility of connecting the design that I create myself and it generates the interfaces from that. This speeds up the design processes, especially in startups in early stages. The UX Pilot AI allows me to work more easily using design systems that are already on the market, and then I can export to Figma for final adjustments, which makes the process much more streamlined. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the UX Pilot AI does not create the designs as it should; they end up being too small or generic. This could be due to the prompts I have been using or it could be the LLM itself behind it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the back and forth integration with Figma, which is an extremely effective workflow. It conserves tokens and empowers my whole team to collaborate while creating a solid single source of truth that we have control over. The usage, versioning, and context features are transparent and easy to work with, and nothing feels like it's locked behind a black box or unpredictable. The initial setup of UX Pilot AI was beyond easy and rapidly very effective; it fixed my Claude Code runaround inside three hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Most things require knowing exactly which menu to use and where it lives - and there's a lot you could do which isn't at all clear from onboarding. You should expect to burn through some tokens before you get used to how it all works together. I would love to make my own design model but I have no idea what to expect. And when it comes to project instructions - how much can I put in there? And I'm still not sure whether I should be using the "desktop" or "mobile" context when I'm designing for something that should work on both. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the seamless integration of UX Pilot AI with Figma, which significantly enhances my workflow for native iOS app creation. This integration saves me time and makes the entire process easier to manage. I also find that it improves the quality of the final screens that I develop, which in turn boosts user trust and enhances my brand presence. Furthermore, getting started with UX Pilot AI was straightforward in terms of registration and subscription, allowing me to focus on leveraging its capabilities to create innovative apps. The fact that UX Pilot AI holds a strong 10 out of 10 likelihood of my recommendation demonstrates the value and reliability I find in its features and performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UX Pilot AI is not very intuitive for those unfamiliar with vibe coding, making the interface challenging to navigate. The platform lacks clarity on how to frame prompts effectively and where to begin, which can be paralyzing for new users. Additionally, there is a need for more comprehensive instructional resources, such as a detailed step-by-step YouTube tutorials, which could greatly assist users in understanding the entire process from initiation to publishing an app on the App Store. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had a great experience with UX Pilot AI, especially finding it very helpful in managing urgent freelance projects where I needed to complete UX and wireframes efficiently. The auto flow feature stands out to me as it automates the division and generation of complete flow screens from the information architecture I provide. This significantly eases the process and helps me quickly achieve high-fidelity wireframes. Moreover, the entire platform is user-friendly, with features that are self-explanatory, making the initial setup seamless and hassle-free. I am very enthusiastic about UX Pilot AI, rating it a perfect 10 out of 10 for recommendation. I actively refer it to friends and colleagues and, in my role as a social media UX mentor, I advocate its benefits to a broader audience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to complaint Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.