I like using Trimble MEPcontent for a few different reasons. I started my CAD journey using native Revit duct/piping and added in Trimble Sysque. I found that using these took a lot of control away from me in selecting what type of fitting or ductwork to use because it processed ductwork for you. For basic jobs without a lot of offsetting and complexity, this is fine. But once I got into complex systems, I was finding myself looking for ways to work around the automated part of Revit for duct and piping. I started using fabrication services through Revit, but it was missing a lot of fittings. Trimble MEPcontent filled that gap for me with a database of fittings, ductwork, piping, plumbing, etc., that I can add to my fabrication service in Revit. With Trimble MEPcontent, I have been able to control the type of fittings to use in my models, and it has sped up my workflow since I have more variety. I use Trimble MEPcontent daily, and it would be hard for me to switch from this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wish Trimble MEPcontent would incorporate better into Revit, whether that is through having an interface or a standalone program. When you add fittings, you have to do it through AutoCAD Fabrication, and it is not intuitive for people who have not worked with AutoCAD much. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
