Siemens Teamcenter works well us when multiple teams are involved. We depend on the BOM structure, document links and workflow approvals every day and they help keep our work organized. The integration with NX and other CAD tools also makes managing desgin data easier, since everything stays connected and theres less manual follow up needed. Role based is another especially given how our team is set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter required support from the team to get configured properly. Also even small changes seem to take more steps than I expected. That said, the dashboards are useful and the search feature helps me find files fastest without wasting time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I work mostly on the compliance and data governence side and Teamcenter fits well in that context because it keeps records clean, consistent and well structured. I mainly use it track lifecycle states and to make sure the data is aligned before it gets pushed to downstream systems. Its tight integration with SAP and our internal reporting tools helps reduce manual checks and rework. I also appreciate that every change is logged properly, which especially useful when I’m building data pipelines for reporting and need a clear audit trail. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter still feels like it has many fields and too steps, even when I’m only making small updated. This the chages are reflected across systems, which makes the process less confusing and easier to follow, it helps with better coordination and redults in fewer production mistakes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter is strong when it comes to audit trails. Every file, change and approval is logged, so it’s easy to see what happened, when it happened, and who signed off. We use it alongside SAP and our internal tools, and it helps keep our records clean, consistent and easier to maintain. I also like the workflow routings and the built in approval steps nothing moves forward without the proper sign off. Overall, it’s been a useful tool for compliance work as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter feels heavy overall, and it can take a while to load at times. It’s also not very intuitive for new users, especially for non-engineering teams trying to get up to speed. That said, it works well with NX and also integrates fine with some third party tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the Teamcenter to be a very great and powerful tool. It is our primary PLM tool, and we've done a lot of customization and integration with various CAD tools. It solves our problems related to managing BOM and product variants, and it's very helpful in tracking changes and providing data traceability. The product configurator is very useful for managing and storing types of product variants. Additionally, Teamcenter offers a very easy user interface to use, and it works well on the integration front. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel the customer care experience could be improved. When I raise any IR, it takes so much time and I don't get a prompt response. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our teams are spread across multiple locations and Teamcenter helps keep everyone aligned. The more we use it alongside CATIA and a few internal tools, the more we’ve seen the data sync stay reliable. I especially like the workflow tracking and how tasks move from desgin through approval without needing constant follow ups and audit trail is also helpful when we need to review past changes and integrating it with CAD and ERP saves us from having to enter the same information twice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its not very fast when working with large assemblies and performance can feel sluggish at times. Teamcenter helps keep everything aligned and organised. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The future of teamcenter with Active workspace and AI capabilities looks great Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Transition from current setup in brown field to new capabilities is quite challenging.

2. The support for teamcenter from Siemens should improve . Getting fixes from Siemens takes long time.

3. Support of Siemens versions is quite short.

4. .It takes quite a few years before the feature required by us is available as part of the product e.g it has taken 4 years to get the features as part of the product which forced us to customize to meet business needs

5. Enterprise customer like us should have closer collaboration, deeper discussions regarding product roadmaps and codevelopment possibilities

6. Siemens tools are becoming quite expensive all the time

7. If we pay for Premium support: We would get bug fixes faster and bug fix package specific for us Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter Siemens change management part works well for us. Once a workflow is set up for approvals follow a clear structured path so we don’t have to chase people manually. I also like how it connects with ERP and other internal systems which help us to avoid re entering the same data.

The classification and document handling features are practical for organizing parts only and it keeping documentation in order. It helps that everyone is working from the same dataset which reduces confusion and improves consistency to keep everyone aligned. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Search can sometimes feel slower than expected, especially particularly as the database grows. I’ve also noticed that few actions require more clicks than they really should which can make the workflow less efficient. On the plus side classification and document handling features are very practical for helping a lot with organizing parts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Teamcenter is a very good tool for me. It really helps us identify duplicates in any project, especially when multiple engineers design different parts and things end up duplicated, so it helps us avoid that. It's very good for handling our data, and it works as good storage for design files, versions, and approvals. With AI integrated, it helps identify existing designs and recommends reusable components, and it gives us faster access to production knowledge. I like the revision tracking and how it automatically identifies the impacted components when there are dependencies, and sends notifications to the responsible teams in the design chain — that has helped us in real time. It also connects to manufacturing data and uses AI to detect patterns and predict quality problems, which improves production accuracy. For change management, when a small design change can impact many dependent parts, it automatically identifies affected components, suppliers, and documents, and the faster approvals are one of the best options for better change management. It lets different teams like design, manufacturing, and quality collaborate using the same data. For setup, the data model configuration is one of the best options, where you define the parts, documents, and workflows, and the active workspace installation and integration setup with CAD tools like Catia and ERP systems play an important role. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It takes time to check the duplicates and come to a picture, so duplicate detection could be faster. The search could be better too. Right now engineers spend a lot of time searching through thousands of documents and CAD files. I think it should have AI semantic search that allows natural queries to identify the real duplicates and recommend similar parts from previous designs. The manual tagging of documents and parts also takes time, so I'd like automated data classification to reduce the manual effort and errors. The AI impact analysis needs to be improved as well, especially for handling how a small design change can impact many dependent parts. I also feel it could improve in a more versatile way when it comes to any industry. And the setup is something you really need to understand, with all the different options, deployment choices, database setup, installation, data model configuration, and integrations, rather than just using the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Teamcenter is an open system with a lot of opportunities, offering plenty of in-built options and the ability to connect with other systems. This is important for our enterprise as we have a grown system landscape and don't have everything from Siemens. Consequently, it's crucial for us to connect a heterogeneous landscape, which Teamcenter supports well. The overall experience with Teamcenter is very good, and thanks to the support from our implementation partner, the initial setup was quite easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Licenses. The current model is not flexible enough. Inactive users keep the license. A more flexible system that clears the license after lets say 30 days would be a huge improvement. Not all features are supported. But that seems to be because of the API of the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Most thing I like about Teamcenter is a big amount of possibilities and tools it brings for users. Sometimes it can be a bit complicated to understand them but if You get it, it's possible to do great things. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some errors that pop up for end users are often much not understable for them. If they would track a bit better on the root of problem then maybe they would be able to solve the problem quicker on their own. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.