# PureBasic Reviews **Vendor:** Fantaisiea Software **Category:** [Text Editor Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/text-editor) **Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 10 ## About PureBasic PureBasic is a native 32-bit and 64-bit programming language based on established BASIC rules. ## PureBasic Reviews ### 1. Cross-platform, efficient, readable, versatil **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Luciana C. | Analista contable, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 17, 2023 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** Cross-platform support, efficient native compilation, readable syntax, comprehensive commands, dedicated community, suitable for beginners and experienced programmers. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** Smaller community compared to mainstream languages, fewer built-in libraries, less third-party support, not as well-known as some alternatives, limited advanced language features compared to some languages. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic addresses cross-platform development, efficiency, readability, versatility, and GUI design, offering a dedicated community for support. ### 2. Truly revolutionizing operations **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Ziang Z. | Interior Design Intern, Design, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 04, 2023 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic keeps getting better and more powerful with each release. The community is generally supportive. Overall its a compiler. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** PureBasic is a language that runs on operating systems it doesnt have the same level of library support. It is difficult due to the steep learning curve. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic solves the issue of programming languages by providing an intuitive syntax. Its speed make it incredibly valuable, for our business. We develop applications without dealing with the complexities of object-oriented programming. ### 3. Structured Programming language for usage **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Abhishek N. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 03, 2023 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic is a high-level programming language known for its simplicity, flexibility, and portability. One of the best features of PureBasic is its ease of use, making it an ideal language for beginners just starting with programming. The syntax of PureBasic is easy to understand, and its powerful commands allow developers to create applications quickly and efficiently. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** It does not have the same community support and resources as some other programming languages. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic is also a cross-platform language, which means that applications developed in PureBasic can run on multiple operating systems, including Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux. This makes it a versatile language for developers who need to create applications that can run on a variety of platforms. ### 4. An excellent word processor for beginners and experts **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Sergio C. | Programador De Software Junior, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 10, 2019 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic has a basic interface with several features to integrate. I like that you have a lot of commands to easily code any program or application. What I find most interesting is that it does not require external DLLs to create executables in the environment. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** There are not many features that I dislike about this software, except sometimes that the text autocomplete function suggests words that do not match the type of variable or type of data being edited. **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** This editor is a great word processor that needs very few computer requirements and can run on different operating systems. In addition, it has full Unicode support and several commands to facilitate coding. I recommend it. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic has benefited us thanks to its file accessibility, since it handles different programming languages ​​and its portability, because it is currently installed on almost all computers in the IT office on different operating systems. In addition, its friendly interface has allowed us employees who just enter the company to adapt easily to develop with this software. ### 5. First class programming language to work with programming codes **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Andry A. | Programador III, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 20, 2019 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** It is a programming language that is easy to learn for anyone starting in programming. It is organized and has a large library, allowing you to create programs ranging from simple to the most powerful. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The IDE requires an improvement, so that the catches and the structure of the programs can be developed much better. It is necessary to add more functions to make it more powerful. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** With the use of this software, you save money, you do not spend much time learning how to use it, and it is easy to maintain. ### 6. PureBasic, the closest thing to C++ without complication **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Internet | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 06, 2016 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** I like how PureBasic is a fairly low level programming language with access to Assembly for those with a death wish, compiling source to true EXE, the ability to hook directly to the Windows API and also ability to hook in any DLL of choice. The language is fairly organised and easy to learn for a beginner, with extremely advanced functionality for those who need or want more out of their applications. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** I think a better GUI and easier ability to compile for various platforms might make this better, for instance right now you can only compile for your platform of choice - which means I have to own each platform in order to roll out an application for various platforms. I suppose though that this makes allot of sense unless you find a remote tester that you wish to send compilations to without having to share the source. **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** Try it, you will not be disappointed, PureBasic is easy to understand and is very similar to popular languages such as Java, c# etc. ### 7. Easy to Use, Multiplatform, Lightweight **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Bryan F. | VMware Engineering Consultant, Information Technology and Services, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic is a great programming language for beginners and pros alike. It has a large (well-documented) library of built-in functions to do almost anything you'd need, which is supplemented by user libraries. These allow one to easily learn the language quickly and start making powerful, lightweight programs. It's multiplatform (Windows, Linux, Mac), with most of the libraries being supported across all three. Programs can be easily written to support multiple platforms using compiler directives, without the need to use something like Java, which has its own problems. Probably the biggest benefit is that the compiled executable are very small and efficient. The disk and memory footprint are typically negligible for most applications you will create. Last but not least, the price of the software is extremely reasonable at $89. This is a single, lifetime license including all updates the software will ever get. Where else do you see this kind price? **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The graphical interface builder that comes with the IDE leaves a lot to be desired. There are free third party GUI editing tools that work much better than PureBasic's built in one. Overall, if your software solution needs a GUI, you're better using something in the .Net environment if possible. The other pain point is that the IDE for coding becomes a pain if your software project starts becoming very large (dozens of includes, dll libraries,etc) **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** Sign up for the PureBasic forums right away. The community for this software is amazing and they're always more than willing to help out newbies. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** Our company used this software to build lightweight monitoring tools that collect statistics on applications and servers, with almost no footprint on their performance. I don't think we would have been able to squeeze out the same performance with a comparable product in the .net or java environments. ### 8. PureBasic **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** David T. | Software Developer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 25, 2015 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** Some of PureBasic's best features are that it is cross-platform ( Windows, Linux and Macintosh ), easily extended by creating libraries, the compiler is fast and creates highly optimized executables with small footprints. I also find that the user community, which the developers are active in, to be one of the best for any programming language I've ever used. PureBasic also has the most frequent release cycle of any commercial programming language, and all updates are free forever after the initial purchase. I've been using PureBasic for 10+ years now and have never failed to accomplish any task attempted. I highly recommend PureBasic ! **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** I can't say that there is anything that I dislike about PureBasic ... and it keeps getting better with each release. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** Encryption, data encoding, databases, and other custom / proprietary solutions. Cost savings, rapid development cycles, ease of code maintenance. ### 9. I developed many apps with PB for more than 5 years **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Lionel L. | Developer, Computer Software, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 11, 2015 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** It's a language really easy to learn, but super flexible (with pointers, structures and classes). It can also be used for so many different usage: windows applications, video games, background program. It can also load external DLLs and you can also write Assembly code (for specific usage or better performance). It was also possible to create your own library and even share it with other users. Unlike .Net or Java distributing your software for everybody to use it is really easy: just share the .EXE file and you're done. No need to to have additional framework installed on that machine. It's also cross system (can be run on Linux even if I never tried it on it). Also installing PureBasic was super fast, taking no drive space and didn't slow down your machine. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The IDE needed probably a bit of improvement for programmers to save some time and help being organized in bigger projects. PureBasic is missing more advanced functions and features than force developers to code over and over again the same things. Also PB is also more a procedural language than a OOP language. The OOP approach wasn't the best and we will most of the time use structures and dedicated functions: ClassName_FunctionName(*object), so more similar to C language. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** You can almost do anything you want with PB; it's almost limitless. And the community can guide/assist you when facing a difficulty. ### 10. PureBasic: Powerful, OOP-less, Speedy **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Rich E. | Technical Senior Program Manager, Windows Command Prompt (C:\>), Computer Software, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic forsakes object oriented for purely procedural programming. It has a syntax that seems familiar to C programmers, great support for Win32 API, and one source project can compile and run (assuming no use of the aforementioned Win32 API) on Mac, Linux and Windows. That's nice, productive cross-platform work! I use PureBasic when I need a Quick GUI app, very easy to built a functional (but not super pretty, in my opinion) user interface. Good for tools, line of business apps, but also has deep game and 3d programming support. Less than $100 for a lifetime license. Active community forum with many skilled experts, including PureBasic creators, to answer your questions. Built in libraries are very comprehensive and include networking, http, all kinds of graphics and on and on and on. Creates (really) small, standalone EXE's that run very fast, like close to C speed. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The IDE is good, but not especially great if you're used to high-end development environments. GUI creator is mired in Windows XP look and feel. You can create awesome UI, of course, it's just not a picnic to get there and will involve lots of manual programming. Community forum members are helpful but can sometimes be very rude -- search for your own answers first and do not overly disparage PureBasic whether you think it's warranted or not and you'll be fine. Might be a learning curve for someone who wants a friendly BASIC compiler. Doing more interesting things requires a good time investment and previous programming experience is very, very helpful. **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** Check out PowerBasic and GLBASIC as well. These are powerful as well and may be more suited to your applications and programming style. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** Easy prototypes of logic and alogorithm, proof of concept UI's, tools of all sorts. I can spend 1 day writing a PureBasic app to ensure that what I'm thinking about doing before diving into the details and laborious coding to make it a complete project. ## PureBasic Discussions - [How fast is PureBasic's compilation speed?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/24885-how-fast-is-purebasic-s-compilation-speed) - 1 comment, 1 upvote - [View PureBasic pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/purebasic/reviews?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-06-12+14%3A49%3A36+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=878f418a-2f6e-4df4-b403-c64290243669&secure%5Btoken%5D=92d25413f8ee15870fb6e438d24099585ce2e2d24642f16f360588f3da12f13a&format=llm_user) ## PureBasic Features **Coding** - Syntax highlighting - Autocompletion - Find and replace - Code folding **Editing** - Collaborative editing - Language Support - Selection Methods **Functionality** - Extensibility - Cross-platform support - Plugins and integrations - Security **Agentic AI - Landing Page Builders** - Cross-system Integration ## Top PureBasic Alternatives - [Visual Studio Code](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio-code/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (2,628 reviews) - [Notepad++](https://www.g2.com/products/notepad/reviews) - 4.6/5.0 (2,410 reviews) - [Sublime Text](https://www.g2.com/products/sublime-text/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (1,749 reviews)