I like that Progress Telerik includes two-dimensional barcodes like QR Codes, Data Matrix, and PDF417, which I use in the prints used by our companies (especially labels that identify the products sold); 2D barcodes are increasingly demanded by customers for their ability to store a lot of information in a small space and are useful for automating the receipt of materials. The ability to have formatting dependent on the dataset being worked on is very useful. In collaboration with SQL Server, I can generate a dataset through stored procedures (with the flexibility provided by a programming language), which offers a wide range of customization possibilities. The integration with SQL Server allows me to customize the prints according to customer needs, extracting different data and allowing the prints to evolve over time, which is a great advantage. I did not encounter any difficulty in starting to use Progress Telerik as the software suppliers who call the Telerik prints had already delivered a working software and the first versions of the reports already functioning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I haven't found anything so far that represents a problem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Solid components that work consistently across multiple platforms. The UI is solid, the documentation is pretty good, and the customer service is great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some components force you into certain workflows and have very complex interactions that can be difficult to manage. At times, the documentation is also a bit vague, which makes it harder to understand how everything is supposed to work together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate Progress Telerik because it saves me time building cool controls and makes it easier to build complete UI forms. I like having the chance to play with the controls on the website, as it gives me ideas on how to implement them. I love the documentation and forums, and the way you can vote for new features and bug fixing. The initial setup was very easy, and I've been using Telerik JS since before it became this big suite. We've been upgrading since then. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used to have the cheapest subscription. I didn't like the waiting time for support, so we upgraded. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Progress Telerik provides powerful, easy-to-use development components that allow rapid development of powerful and user-friendly user interfaces. Pricing is competitive and discounts for bundling multiple licenses and years of support make the products "easy to sell" to decision-makers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Grids are not optimized to natively handle large datasets, which requires custom logic to handle paging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Progress Telerik to create reports included in applications and appreciate it for its ease of use, performance, and versatility. I especially value the UI controls available for MVC, WebForms, Angular, and Blazor as they cater to a wide range of needs. The initial setup was very easy, which made the transition to using it smooth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think documentation could be improved with more advanced use cases and scenarios. Some features of the products are not available in the documentation, for example, some advanced databinding features for Reporting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the speed of development and the responsiveness of user support, along with how easy it is to get started using the pre-made projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s a bit difficult to learn at first, and I’ve also noticed that the properties of certain components aren’t always consistent with those of other components, which can make things confusing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use the asp.net ajax controls and we love how great the look on our internal applications. We also love that vast array of different types of controls available as we always find one that we need to meet our developement task. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think sometimes the examples could be more diverse. We have found copilot to be a great help though when need examples of code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the support from Progress Telerik, which is very efficient and fast. The engineers show dedication in addressing the needs. Additionally, I appreciate the extensive documentation and the availability of many sample projects to get started, which makes the process easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Yes, it would be interesting if they developed more code examples, because they have a lot of examples, but when one goes to program directly in CCHAR, there are hardly any examples. There are examples for Maui, examples for Maui NET Core 8 and 9, but when one tries to run them in 10, there are quite a few execution problems due to the platform change. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Progress Telerik to modernize my Windows applications. It allows me to enhance the aesthetic appearance of applications that are many years old. I appreciate the support for the latest Microsoft styles, particularly Fluent, as I can give my applications a modern look that follows Microsoft's Fluent guidelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although the support for Fluent is good, it is not perfect and differs slightly between Windows Forms and WPF. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Telerik made a big effort on UI components.

Support is efficient: thay answer fast (<24h) and with solutions.

Components maintenance is good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, some lack in documentation on very technical points.

(but support is answering questions if necessary) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.