Microsoft SQL Server is easy to use, even for beginners. The interface in SSMS is simple, and implementation is straightforward with clear setup steps. It offers many useful features like views, stored procedures, and strong security. I also use it frequently because it feels reliable and stable. Another big advantage is how well it integrates with Excel, Power BI, and other Microsoft tools, which makes reporting and analysis much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside is that SQL Server can feel heavy during installation and requires a good system to run smoothly. Some features are only available in higher paid versions, which may not be ideal for small teams. Integration with non-Microsoft tools can sometimes need extra steps. Also, customer support can be slow unless you are on an enterprise plan. Overall, while it works well, the setup and advanced features can be a bit challenging for beginners. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are running Microsoft SQL Server on virtual machines, and it consistently delivers strong performance even under heavy performance loads. We have integrated with Microsoft Power BI and built a dashboard that pulls data from SQL Server, and users can interact with reports without needing to understand the backend. It comes with the great management tool Microsoft SQL Management Studio, which is one of my favorite admin tools. I used it daily for backup management and user permissions. We migrated some of the SQL Server workloads to Azure SQL database. The transition was smooth, and it gives flexibility to scale based on budget and workload. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Understanding the SQL Server licensing is complex, especially when mixing CALs and core-based models. Reporting and analysis workloads are resource-intensive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using MSSQL daily for over 15 years, and I can confidently say that it is designed to handle high transaction volumes and manage large datasets effectively. It offers a very stable and highly secure environment for data management, making it well-suited for both small applications and large enterprise systems. Depending on your requirements, you can select from several editions, such as Express, Developer, Standard, or Enterprise. Integration with other products like Azure, Excel, or PowerBI is straightforward and intuitive. While the general implementation process is simple, setting up high availability options can be more time-consuming. The documantation and technical support are excelent, there are many official guides, tutorials and free community resources that it makes easy to learn and troubleshoot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features are still lacking or limited in SQL, which can make some tasks more difficult to complete.Additionaly the license cost can be quite expensive for enterprise level deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

what i like best about Microsoft SQL server is how simple it is to use and set up. Even if you are not a database expert, the interface feels friendly and easy to understand. Installing and implementing it doesn't take forever, and once it is running, it works smoothly without much hassle. there are lot of features that help with managing data, and I use it almost every day because it is so reliable. whenever i have needed help, the customer support has been always helpful and quick which makes the experience even better. overall, it is a solid tool that does what you need without making things complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing I don't like about Microsoft SQL server is that it can feel heavy and resource-hungry, especially on smaller systems. Sometimes the licensing costs are high, which makes it hard for small businesses. A few advanced features can be tricky to learn if you are new, and upgrades or migrations take time and planning. It's a great tool overall, but it's not the budget friendly or lightweight option out there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Microsoft SQL Server is one of the easiest databases to setup and use, especially if you are developing a .NET application using C# or VB. the visual editor available in Visual Studio makes it much easier to build relational databases. Configuring various constraints like Primary keys, Foreign keys, and mappings is quite straightforward.

With respect to coding, integrating SQL Server data objects with C# is simple with the help of ADO.NET.

Overall, a great product from Microsoft. I have used both the server version as well as the compact editions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You might have to struggle a bit to integrate Microsoft SQL server

setup if you plan to use it with languages like PHP and Python. However, if you install the right driver, then it shouldn't be much of an issue.

The pricing is a bit on the higher side, especially for the Enterprise Edition. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Balance of performance, reliability, and ease of management. The integration of tool and features such as Query Store, execution plans, and indexing options make it easier to optimize and troubleshoot complex queries. it’s easy to use SQL Server frequently in day-to-day operations, Its consistency and predictability make it an excellent choice for both development and production environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Certain advanced tuning operations can become cumbersome — especially when working with large datasets or deeply nested queries. Customer support, while responsive, can be inconsistent in terms of technical depth Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Microsoft SQL Server is its combination of power, reliability, and ease of use. It’s a robust relational database system that handles both small and massive datasets efficiently, making it suitable for everything from single applications to large enterprise solutions. I appreciate its tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure, Power BI, and .NET, which makes reporting, analytics, and application development seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the main drawbacks of Microsoft SQL Server is its cost, as licensing can be expensive, especially for enterprise editions or large-scale deployments. It can also be resource-intensive, requiring substantial memory and CPU for optimal performance. While it now supports Linux, it has historically been Windows-centric, which can limit flexibility in some environments. Advanced features like Always On, replication, or partitioning are powerful but often complex to configure and maintain. Additionally, the different editions with varying feature sets can be confusing, and Microsoft’s licensing rules can sometimes be tricky to navigate, particularly in cloud or hybrid setups. Overall, SQL Server is powerful but can be costly, resource-heavy, and complex for advanced use cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance and control in large volumes of data, seamless integration with .NET / C#.

I like SQL Server because it is solid, predictable, integrates perfectly with .NET, and gives me total control when working with large data and critical processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Be heavy on RAM and CPU, expensive licenses in production Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Microsoft SQL Server's stability, performance, and strong security features. It handles transactional workloads very reliably and supports high availability with backup and recovery options. It also integrates well with enterprise applications and tools, making it a dependable choice for mission critical systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Licensing can be expensive for enterprises. Performance tuning and query optimization require experienced DBAs, especially as data grows. Scaling very large workloads can become complex compared to some newer cloud-native databases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that ease of use and setup is key. That it's robust ability to handle large data sets and makes report running an ease. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that SSMS is lacking some features that dbeaver for instance has and is taken for granted. For instance the ability to easily delete tables from a database so you can recreate them. In SSMS you have to drop the table through scripting and isn't as elegant of a solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.