Gatling Pricing Overview

Free Trial

Gatling Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 28, 2026


Gatling offers 4 pricing editions, starting at $0. Gatling pricing tiers are designed to support different usage levels and team sizes. Gatling also offers a free trial. Higher-tier plans are available via direct consultation with the vendor. Compare the Gatling pricing table below to figure out the best fit for your needs.


Community — $0 / Per Month
Basic — €89 / Per Month
Team — €356 / Per Month
Enterprise — Contact Us
Rated 4.4 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Gatling Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI
Is Gatling free, or does it offer a free trial?

Gatling does not offer a permanent free plan, but it does provide a free trial that lets users to test the product before committing to a paid plan. Trial availability and duration may vary, so users should review the seller's official pricing page for the most current details.

How much does Gatling cost in 2026?

According to G2 data, Gatling pricing in 2026 starts at €89.00 and can reach €356.00 depending on the selected plan. Pricing may vary based on billing terms or usage, so users should review the Gatling's official pricing page for the most current details.

Who is Gatling pricing best suited for?

Gatling's pricing is best suited for developer-centric engineering teams across small businesses and mid-market companies, particularly in banking, financial services, IT services, and retail. G2 reviewers from these segments consistently highlight CI/CD integration, code-based test scenarios, and scalable VU counts as primary value drivers. The Basic tier at €89/month fits small teams running focused API or HTTP load tests, while the Team tier at €356/month suits growing mid-market teams embedding performance testing into DevOps workflows. Enterprise-tier buyers, including large-scale users simulating millions of requests or requiring custom load generator configurations, appear across logistics, healthcare, and telecommunications in G2 reviews.

What are the key differences between the free and paid versions of Gatling?

Gatling's free Community tier provides limited free minutes to evaluate Gatling Enterprise's premium features, functioning as a trial rather than a fully functional ongoing plan. Gatling's paid plans begin at €89/month for the Basic tier, which unlocks up to 60,000 virtual users, one hour of testing, one load generator, two seats, and AI-assisted testing features. G2 reviewers note that the open-source version lacks real-time reporting and has distributed testing limitations, both of which are addressed in paid tiers. The Team plan at €356/month adds 180,000 VUs, distributed testing, professional support, and ten seats, while Enterprise offers fully custom configurations.

Is Gatling considered good value for its pricing?

G2 reviewers broadly regard Gatling as strong value, particularly given its open-source foundation and lightweight architecture that reduces infrastructure costs. Multiple reviewers across banking, financial services, and IT explicitly note that Gatling's resource efficiency allows simulating large user volumes on minimal hardware, directly cutting costs compared to alternatives like JMeter or HP tooling. The €89/month Basic tier is seen as accessible for small teams, while the €356/month Team tier earns praise for CI/CD integration and distributed testing capabilities. A few reviewers flag that the free open-source tier feels less flexible than fully open alternatives, and enterprise pricing requires vendor contact, which can slow procurement.

Gatling Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Computer Software
UC
Verified User in Computer Software
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Rich Data Generators and Powerful Simulation Run Management"
5/5
What do you like best about Gatling?

I like the flexibility I get in implementing data generators (feeders). This allows for representative and sufficiently random data that ultimately gives meaningful performance test results.

I also like the simulation run management and history offered by the enterprise product which lets non-engineers to access and use the results directly.

The technical documentation is an ever-evolving artifact but in its current state it is useful and well structured and helps newcomers create effective simulations, not just "hello world" versions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Gatling?

Some of our integrations (e.g. with Github workflows) are brittle, although I should add that they are improving both the integrations themselves and the relevant documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Diego Salinas of Gatling

Thank you so much for the thoughtful review.

It’s great to hear Gatling is helping your team create more realistic tests, share results more easily, and keep performance work connected to real engineering goals.

We also appreciate your honest note on integrations. CI/CD reliability really matters, and feedback like this helps us keep improving both the product and the documentation.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your experience with Gatling.

Sanjeev G.
SG
Sanjeev G.
SDET
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Robust Load Testing with Gatling, Slight Learning Curve"
4/5
What do you like best about Gatling?

Gatling is a useful tool for performance and load testing, and I found it relatively easy to work with. I like that the tests can be defined and maintained in a structured way, making it easier to reuse and update scenarios. The reporting and performance metrics are helpful for identifying potential bottlenecks and understanding how an application behaves under load. Gatling provides a clear and repeatable approach to performance testing, making it easier to analyze the results after a test run. Additionally, I appreciate how well Gatling fits into CI/CD workflows with its automation capabilities, and how it integrates with existing development and testing workflows, which makes it easier to include performance testing as part of the overall QA process. The initial setup was relatively straightforward, making it easy to get started with creating and running test scenarios. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Gatling?

One area that could be improved is the initial learning curve, especially for users who are new to code-based performance testing. It can take some time to become familiar with the concepts and syntax. The reporting and analysis could also be made a little more intuitive for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Gatling Comparisons