# Which Unified API platforms let teams ensure security and compliance before signing a long-term vendor contract?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm researching which Unified API platforms give teams enough visibility into security and compliance posture to feel confident before committing to a long-term contract. Inside <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/unified-apis">Unified APIs</a>, <strong>Merge Unified</strong>, <strong>Codat</strong>, and <strong>Apideck Unify</strong> are the names most associated with clear compliance credentials.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/merge-unified/reviews"><strong>Merge Unified</strong></a>: reviewers point to its security documentation and compliance certifications as a meaningful part of vendor evaluation, useful for procurement teams needing that before sign-off.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/codat/reviews"><strong>Codat</strong></a>: built with financial data compliance in mind given its accounting and finance integration focus, relevant for teams in regulated industries.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/apideck-unify/reviews"><strong>Apideck Unify</strong></a>: transparent about its security practices, which reviewers note made internal security reviews faster before committing long-term.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/plaid/reviews"><strong>Plaid</strong></a>: operating in financial services means its compliance posture has been through significant real world scrutiny, relevant context even outside pure banking use cases.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nylas/reviews"><strong>Nylas</strong></a>: handles sensitive communications data, with security practices that matter for teams evaluating it against strict compliance requirements.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that went through a full security review before signing with one of these, what actually took the longest, getting documentation from the vendor, or getting internal security sign-off once you had it?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Internal sign-off took longer for us than getting documentation out of Merge Unified. Their security documentation was ready quickly, it was our own security team&#39;s review queue that ended up being the bottleneck.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4