# Conga Composer vs Docusign CLM for a sales ops team that needs both document generation and e-signature without juggling two separate contracts?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been weighing Conga Composer vs Docusign CLM for a sales ops team that wants both document generation and e-signature under one contract, not two vendors to juggle. If flexible doc generation is the main job and signing is secondary, Conga is the tighter fit; if the contract lifecycle is the core need, Docusign CLM leads on signing but is heavier to run. The catch: neither is truly both in one product, so it comes down to which vendor's bundle you'd rather sign.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews"><strong>Conga Composer</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 907 reviews): A strong Salesforce document generation engine. E-signature comes from Conga Sign, so you keep generation and signing under one vendor and one relationship. Reviewers praise the accurate, branded output; the trade-off is admin-heavy template setup.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/docusign-clm/reviews"><strong>Docusign CLM</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 492 reviews): Built around signing and the full contract lifecycle, with native e-signature and approval routing. It generates from templates too, but it's more contract management than flexible doc gen, and reviewers call implementation heavy and pricey.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For a sales ops team, I'd lean Conga (Composer plus Conga Sign) when the day-to-day is generating quotes and contracts that then need a signature, and Docusign CLM when managing the contract lifecycle and compliance is the bigger problem.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you run one of these for both generation and signing, did sticking with a single vendor keep things simple, or did you still end up adding a second tool?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Sticking to one vendor definitely keeps things cleaner, though contracts that need back-and-forth negotiation often pull in a separate tool at some point anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 13 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4