Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Gatling and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
No pricing available
Gatling
Star Rating
(61)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
Browse all 5 pricing plansOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in its Test Variety, scoring 9.3, which allows for a wide range of testing scenarios, while Gatling, with a score of 8.0, offers fewer options in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Gatling shines in Stress Testing, achieving a score of 9.0, indicating its robust capabilities in handling high-load scenarios, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Professional scores 8.3, suggesting it may not perform as well under extreme conditions.
- G2 users highlight the superior Reporting features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional, which received a score of 9.0, providing detailed insights and analytics, while Gatling's reporting capabilities, scoring 8.0, are seen as less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional has a more challenging Ease of Setup with a score of 6.7, compared to Gatling's 7.8, indicating that Gatling may be more user-friendly for initial configurations.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for Product Direction at 8.5, suggesting that users feel confident in the future development and support of both software solutions.
- Users say that while both products have good Quality of Support, Gatling edges out with a score of 7.9 compared to OpenText LoadRunner Professional's 7.6, indicating a slightly better user experience when seeking assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Gatling
Gatling Enterprise Cloud and Self-Hosted
Free Trial
Per Month
Try Gatling Enterprise for free with premium features.
- Limited free minutes
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableFree Trial
Gatling
Free Trial is available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
53
9.1
23
Ease of Use
7.7
53
8.3
24
Ease of Setup
7.8
25
6.7
9
Ease of Admin
7.6
24
7.4
9
Quality of Support
7.9
44
7.6
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
23
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
48
8.5
23
Features by Category
Functionality
9.0
43
8.3
7
7.5
33
7.4
7
8.0
39
9.3
7
Reporting
8.0
44
9.0
7
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Gatling and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering are categorized as Load Testing Tools and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Gatling has no unique categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Gatling
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Banking
10.0%
Retail
8.3%
Computer & Network Security
5.0%
Other
38.3%
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is Gatling better than JMeter?
1 Comment
IZ
yesRead more
What are the protocols supported by Gatling?
1 Comment
PD
Hey there,
I'm the Customer Success Team Lead here at Gatling. Apologies for the delayed reply. We have native support for HTTP, HTTPs, MQTT, and JMS....Read more
Gatling has no more discussions with answers
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
