# Top 10 Font Awesome Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 34 The Other Web Frameworks Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Font Awesome. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Font Awesome include projects. The best overall Font Awesome alternative is Material Design for Bootstrap. Other similar apps like Font Awesome are IHP, handlebars, Ruby on Rails, and ASP.NET. Font Awesome alternatives can be found in [Other Web Frameworks Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Font Awesome - [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) - [IHP](https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews) - [handlebars](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) - [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) - [ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/products/asp-net/reviews) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/products/gwt-google-web-toolkit/reviews) - [Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/products/sinatra/reviews) - [JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/products/jquery-ui/reviews) - [Netty](https://www.g2.com/products/netty/reviews) - [WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/products/webrtc/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Font Awesome Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Font Awesome stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Telecommunications, and Education Management, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/products/material-design-for-bootstrap/reviews) By MDB **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 25 Material Design for Bootstrap is a free, powerful Material Design UI KIT for Bootstrap 4. It is a comprehensive material design frameworks that was created to date. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, Material Design for Bootstrap is: - Easier to set up - Better at meeting requirements - Better at support Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) **Compare Material Design for Bootstrap with other alternatives:** - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-handlebars) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-sinatra) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-netty) - [Material Design for Bootstrap vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-webrtc) ### 2. [IHP](https://www.g2.com/products/ihp/reviews) By digitally induced **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 191 IHP (Integrated Haskell Platform) is a comprehensive web framework designed to streamline the development of robust and type-safe web applications. Built on Haskell and Nix, IHP offers a productive and enjoyable development experience, enabling developers to build high-quality software efficiently. Its emphasis on server-side rendering, combined with modern development tools, positions IHP as a compelling choice for both newcomers and seasoned developers seeking a reliable and efficient web development framework. Key Features and Functionality: - Instant Live Reloading: IHP's development server automatically reloads code changes, reflecting updates instantly without resetting the page state, thereby enhancing the development workflow. - HSX (Haskell JSX): Inspired by React's JSX, HSX allows developers to write HTML directly within Haskell files. This code is type-checked and compiled at compile time, ensuring error-free templates and automatic escaping to prevent XSS attacks. - Web-Based Schema Designer: IHP includes a visual database schema designer, facilitating the creation and management of data structures. Changes made through this tool are reflected in actual SQL statements, maintaining compatibility with version control systems. - Security: Leveraging Haskell's strong type system, IHP mitigates common security vulnerabilities such as XSS and SQL injection, providing a secure foundation for web applications. - Productive Development Tooling: IHP offers a suite of web-based development tools, including a code generator and REPL, to accelerate the development process. - SQL-Centric Design: By promoting the use of plain SQL over complex ORMs, IHP provides simple database access functions that map directly to underlying SQL statements, ensuring clarity and efficiency. - Auto Refresh: IHP's Auto Refresh feature enables real-time data display by re-rendering views when underlying data changes, simplifying the implementation of dynamic content. Primary Value and Problem Solving: IHP addresses the challenges of modern web development by offering a type-safe, productive, and enjoyable framework that simplifies the creation of web applications. Its integration of Haskell's strong type system ensures reliability and security, while the inclusion of modern development tools and features like instant live reloading and HSX enhances developer productivity. By focusing on server-side rendering and providing a comprehensive set of tools, IHP enables developers to build high-quality web applications efficiently, reducing complexity and development time. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, IHP is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ihp) **Compare IHP with other alternatives:** - [IHP vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [IHP vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-handlebars) - [IHP vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [IHP vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ihp) - [IHP vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-ihp) - [IHP vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-sinatra) - [IHP vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-jquery-ui) - [IHP vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-netty) - [IHP vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-webrtc) ### 3. [handlebars](https://www.g2.com/products/handlebars/reviews) By handlebars **Average Rating:** 3.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 13 handlebars provide the power necessary to let you build semantic templates, compatible with Mustache templates. Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-handlebars) **Compare handlebars with other alternatives:** - [handlebars vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-handlebars) - [handlebars vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/webrtc-vs-handlebars) ### 4. [Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/products/ruby-on-rails/reviews) By Open Source Initiative (OSI) **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 83 Ruby on Rails, commonly referred to as Rails, is an open-source server-side web application framework written in the Ruby programming language. It follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, providing default structures for databases, web services, and web pages. Rails emphasizes the use of well-known software engineering principles such as Convention over Configuration (CoC) and Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY), aiming to simplify and accelerate the development of database-driven web applications. Key Features and Functionality: - Active Record: An object-relational mapping (ORM) layer that simplifies database interactions by representing tables as classes and rows as objects, allowing developers to perform database operations using Ruby code. - Action Pack: A component that combines the controller and view layers of the MVC framework, facilitating the handling of web requests and rendering of responses. - Active Support: A collection of utility classes and standard library extensions that enhance the Ruby language, providing additional functionalities to simplify coding tasks. - Action Mailer: A framework for designing email services, enabling the creation and delivery of emails from a Rails application. - Convention over Configuration (CoC): Rails reduces the need for explicit configuration by following established conventions, allowing developers to focus on application logic rather than boilerplate code. - Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY): This principle encourages the reduction of code duplication, promoting maintainability and scalability by ensuring that each piece of information has a single, unambiguous representation within the system. Primary Value and Problem Solving: Ruby on Rails streamlines the web development process by providing a comprehensive framework that integrates seamlessly with databases and web services. By adhering to the CoC and DRY principles, Rails minimizes the amount of code developers need to write, reducing the likelihood of errors and enhancing productivity. Its modular design and extensive library of gems (plugins) allow for rapid development and easy customization, making it an ideal choice for startups and enterprises aiming to build robust, scalable web applications efficiently. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, Ruby on Rails is: - Easier to admin - Better at meeting requirements - Better at support Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-ruby-on-rails) **Compare Ruby on Rails with other alternatives:** - [Ruby on Rails vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-handlebars) - [Ruby on Rails vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-sinatra) - [Ruby on Rails vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Ruby on Rails vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-webrtc) ### 5. [ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/products/asp-net/reviews) By Microsoft **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 59 ASP.NET is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft for building modern web applications and services using .NET. It is cross-platform, running on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Docker, enabling developers to create dynamic, high-performance web solutions across various environments. Key Features and Functionality: - Cross-Platform Compatibility: Develop and run applications seamlessly on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Docker. - Razor Syntax: Utilize Razor, a web-page templating syntax, to build dynamic web pages with C#. - Model-View-Controller (MVC) Pattern: Implement the MVC design pattern to achieve a clear separation of concerns, enhancing code maintainability and scalability. - Integrated Authentication System: Leverage built-in libraries and templates for handling user authentication, including multi-factor authentication and external providers like Google and X. - Real-Time Communication with SignalR: Enable real-time, bi-directional communication between server and client, facilitating interactive web applications. - Open-Source and Community-Driven: Benefit from a robust ecosystem with over 100,000 contributions and support from more than 3,700 companies. Primary Value and User Solutions: ASP.NET empowers developers to build versatile, high-performance web applications efficiently. Its cross-platform nature ensures flexibility in deployment, while the integration of modern development patterns and tools streamlines the development process. By providing a comprehensive framework with built-in support for authentication, real-time communication, and dynamic content generation, ASP.NET addresses the needs of developers seeking to create secure, scalable, and maintainable web solutions. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, ASP.NET is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements - Easier to admin Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-font-awesome) **Compare ASP.NET with other alternatives:** - [ASP.NET vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [ASP.NET vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ihp) - [ASP.NET vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-handlebars) - [ASP.NET vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [ASP.NET vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-gwt-google-web-toolkit) - [ASP.NET vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-sinatra) - [ASP.NET vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-jquery-ui) - [ASP.NET vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-netty) - [ASP.NET vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-webrtc) ### 6. [GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/products/gwt-google-web-toolkit/reviews) By Google **Average Rating:** 3.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 15 GWT is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript. GWT is used by many products at Google, including AdWords, AdSense, Flights, Hotel Finder, Offers, Wallet, Blogger. It’s open source, completely free, and used by thousands of developers around the world. Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-gwt-google-web-toolkit) **Compare GWT - Google Web Toolkit with other alternatives:** - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-ihp) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-handlebars) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-gwt-google-web-toolkit) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-sinatra) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-jquery-ui) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-netty) - [GWT - Google Web Toolkit vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-webrtc) ### 7. [Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/products/sinatra/reviews) By Open Source Initiative (OSI) **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 21 Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort: Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, Sinatra is: - More usable - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-sinatra) **Compare Sinatra with other alternatives:** - [Sinatra vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-handlebars) - [Sinatra vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-sinatra) - [Sinatra vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-webrtc) ### 8. [JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/products/jquery-ui/reviews) By jqueryui **Average Rating:** 3.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 28 jQuery UI is a curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, JQuery UI is: - Easier to set up Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-jquery-ui) **Compare JQuery UI with other alternatives:** - [JQuery UI vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-material-design-for-bootstrap) - [JQuery UI vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-handlebars) - [JQuery UI vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [JQuery UI vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-jquery-ui) - [JQuery UI vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-sinatra) - [JQuery UI vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-netty) - [JQuery UI vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-webrtc) ### 9. [Netty](https://www.g2.com/products/netty/reviews) By Netty **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 20 Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, Netty is: - Better at meeting requirements - Better at support Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-netty) **Compare Netty with other alternatives:** - [Netty vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-netty) - [Netty vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-netty) - [Netty vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-handlebars) - [Netty vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-ruby-on-rails) - [Netty vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-netty) - [Netty vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-netty) - [Netty vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-sinatra) - [Netty vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-netty) - [Netty vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-webrtc) ### 10. [WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/products/webrtc/reviews) By WebRTC **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 29 WebRTC is an open framework for the web that enables Real Time Communications in the browser. It includes the fundamental building blocks for high-quality communications on the web, such as network, audio and video components used in voice and video chat applications. Reviewers say compared to Font Awesome, WebRTC is: - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Font Awesome: [Other Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-web-frameworks) **Compare:** [Font Awesome vs WebRTC](https://www.g2.com/compare/font-awesome-vs-webrtc) **Compare WebRTC with other alternatives:** - [WebRTC vs Material Design for Bootstrap](https://www.g2.com/compare/material-design-for-bootstrap-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs IHP](https://www.g2.com/compare/ihp-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs handlebars](https://www.g2.com/compare/webrtc-vs-handlebars) - [WebRTC vs Ruby on Rails](https://www.g2.com/compare/ruby-on-rails-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs ASP.NET](https://www.g2.com/compare/asp-net-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs GWT - Google Web Toolkit](https://www.g2.com/compare/gwt-google-web-toolkit-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Sinatra](https://www.g2.com/compare/sinatra-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs JQuery UI](https://www.g2.com/compare/jquery-ui-vs-webrtc) - [WebRTC vs Netty](https://www.g2.com/compare/netty-vs-webrtc) ## Explore Articles - [What is the most affordable transcription service for SMBs?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-transcription-service-for-smbs) - [Best software for mapping and monitoring exposed assets](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-software-for-mapping-and-monitoring-exposed-assets) - [Name some enterprise information archiving platforms avoiding implementation delays and ensuring data integrity during migration.](https://www.g2.com/discussions/name-some-enterprise-information-archiving-platforms-avoiding-implementation-delays-and-ensuring-data-integrity-during-migration ) - [Best operational risk management software you've used](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-operational-risk-management-software-you-ve-used-and-why) - [Branding Agencies in Phoenix](https://www.g2.com/categories/branding-agencies/locations/phoenix-az-us) - [Best customer success software for small tech startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-customer-success-software-for-small-tech-startups) ## Spotlight Categories - [Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/third-party-supplier-risk-management) - [E-commerce Fraud Protection Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/e-commerce-fraud-protection) - [Social Media Management Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/social-media-mgmt)