ezCAC™ Pricing Overview
ezCAC™ Pricing Key Insights
Last updated on Apr 09, 2026
Information about ezCAC™ pricing, plan availability, and costs is not listed on G2 by the vendor. Buyers typically need to engage directly with the vendor to understand pricing options. Final cost negotiations to purchase ezCAC™ must be conducted with the seller.
Top-Rated Alternatives
ezCAC™ Alternatives Pricing
The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other Core Administrative Processing Systems Software
| Product | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
 Chiropractic Cash Plan |
Starting at $177.00Per Month |
Ideal For: Non-insurance practices
Includes: Unlimited visits, 2 provider logins ($25/mo each additional provider)
|
 SPRY Essentials |
Contact Us1 full-time provider Per Month |
Based on number of visits per full-time provider, pro-rata pricing available for part-time providers
|
 On-site Access Management |
Contact UsPer Year |
Make access to your facility, staff, and patients seamless and secure. Ensure only guests and visitors who meet security requirements can enter your facility.
|
Various alternatives pricing & plans
Pricing information for the above various ezCAC™ alternatives is supplied by the respective software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase any of these products must be conducted with the seller.
Categories on G2
Explore More
Which financial audit tool integrates with accounting systems for direct data access and audit sampling capabilities?Is there a reliable identity resolution tool that a small DTC brand just starting with personalization can actually afford without an enterprise contract?Best contact center workforce management software for small business
Which Customer Journey Analytics Platforms Integrate Seamlessly With Existing Enterprise Systems?What are the best business productivity tools available on AWS marketplace?What is the smartest programmatic job advertising solution for cutting cost-per-click on Indeed and LinkedIn rather than just increasing spend to get more applicants?