What do you like best?
Azure Virtual WAN service enabled us to have an optimized, automated and wide scale branch connectivity. It brings us the ability to solid connectivity between our branches to Azure with SDWAN devices using built in ease of use and automated connectivity and configuration management.
What do you dislike?
Needs to be expertly managed and maintained, which includes patching and server monitoring. Unlike local services, it requires expertise to ensure all moving parts work together efficiently.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's easy to run, so rational and easy going by preventing you to define erroneous settings.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
As a company with some branches across the world, we need to connect all around the world and provide interconnectivity. Using Riverbed’s SteelConnect and Microsoft’s Azure Virtual WAN have assisted us to deploy locations in minutes easily in a few steps, control the access and privileges , and remove sophisticated and costly scenarios. This capability will allow us to engage in new markets with great speed and agility.