Arnica Pricing Overview

Free Trial

Arnica Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 30, 2026


Arnica offers 3 pricing editions, starting from $0 to $60. Arnica pricing tiers are designed to support different usage levels and team sizes. Arnica also offers a free trial. Compare the Arnica pricing table below to figure out the best fit for your needs. Some plans may require you to contact Arnica for custom pricing.


Free — $0 / Per Month
Business — $30 / 1 Identity Per Month
Enterprise — $60 / 1 Identity Per Month
Rated 4.4 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Arnica Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI

Is Arnica free, or does it offer a free trial?

Yes. According to G2 data, Arnica offers a free plan with limited features. Users can upgrade to paid plans for additional capabilities. Visit the seller's official pricing page to compare plan options and features.

How much does Arnica cost in 2026?

According to G2 data, Arnica pricing in 2026 starts at $30.00 and can reach $60.00 depending on the selected plan. Pricing may vary based on billing terms or usage, so users should review the Arnica's official pricing page for the most current details.

Who is Arnica pricing best suited for?

Arnica's pricing suits a wide range of buyers, but G2 review patterns reveal distinct fits per tier. Small-business and startup reviewers in IT and computer software gravitate toward the free and Core Business tiers, citing budget sensitivity and fast GitHub setup as key factors. Enterprise reviewers in financial services, insurance, and computer software concentrate on Core Enterprise, leveraging RBAC, SAML, Jira integration, API access, and the security champions program to manage thousands of developers. Mid-market security teams in computer and network security also appear in G2 reviews, focused on least-privilege enforcement and supply chain visibility. Teams without GitHub Enterprise should note some feature limitations flagged by G2 reviewers.

What are the key differences between the free and paid versions of Arnica?

Arnica's free tier delivers SCA, SAST, IaC, secrets detection, SBOM, license compliance, and full asset and risk inventory, but risk data refreshes only weekly and lacks real-time capabilities. Arnica's Core Business tier at $25/month adds real-time scanning, push notifications, ChatOps integrations with Slack and MS Teams, inline PR risk identification, advanced secrets validation, and zero new secrets policy enforcement. Arnica's Core Enterprise tier at $50/month further adds AI-generated code fixes, automated PR remediation, zero-day campaigns, dynamic backlog management, Jira and Azure DevOps integration, advanced RBAC, SAML provisioning, and API access. G2 reviewers highlight the policy engine and developer-native workflows as primary upgrade drivers.

Is Arnica considered good value for its pricing?

G2 reviewers rate Arnica at 4.5–5.0 across segments, signaling strong cost-to-value sentiment. One enterprise reviewer explicitly noted Arnica was priced competitively against Checkmarx, Snyk, and GitHub Advanced Security, and that the per-identity model scaled sensibly as teams grew. A financial services reviewer stated Arnica had already paid for itself through process optimization and developer tool cost savings via license right-sizing. Small-business reviewers cite budget-sensitivity as a key selection factor, with the free tier delivering meaningful coverage. The main pricing friction noted was that the per-identity model required extra work to normalize against competitors during procurement, though reviewers concluded the pricing was fair once comparisons were equalized.

Arnica Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Computer Software
EC
Verified User in Computer Software
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Intuitive Dashboards and AI That Finds Real Issues"
5/5
What do you like best about Arnica?

Works well within existing pipelines. The dashboards are intuitive to use. It's is simple for developers to find their findings to address their code issues.

The SLAs per branch is useful when you have many different

development teams. The newer AI capabilities work well to find real issues instead of FUD. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Arnica?

While the dashboard is intuitive, management reporting would be useful. The lack of DAST compared to competitors is a small issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jirka H.
JH
Jirka H.
External Lecturer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Worse signal-to-noise ratio than Mend SCA; offset by lower cost and better UI"
3/5
What do you like best about Arnica?

1) Inexpensive

2) Stable

3) Positivity: Arnica reports not just issues introduced in a code change, but also issues that a code change removes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Arnica?

It's not watertight. I was unable to find out why it failed to report certain specific disclosure or policy events (such as CVE-2026-47300, CVSS 8.8 or a dependency switching to OSMF); whereas minor issues in non-production code get reported prolifically.

Signal to noise ratio thus has some room for improvement in both on the signal part and the noise part. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.