# Which AR training simulators have the highest user engagement and retention rates?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ar-training-simulator">AR training simulators</a> have the highest user engagement and retention rates? I want to be straightforward about this one too: none of the reviews I pulled include an actual retention percentage or completion rate number, so what follows is qualitative sentiment about engagement rather than hard metrics, which is worth knowing before you weigh these ratings too heavily.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/synergyxr/reviews"><strong>SynergyXR</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 13 reviews): reviewers describe the experience as captivating and say it's genuinely helpful for visual learners, though one reviewer separately rated it only 2.5 stars over workflow confusion, so engagement clearly isn't universal.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/reflekt-one/reviews"><strong>Reflekt One</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 10 reviews): reviewers describe it as more detailed and engaging than a standard training video, though the sample here is small enough that a couple of strong opinions carry real weight in that average.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/help-lightning/reviews"><strong>Help Lightning</strong></a> (4.8 stars, 67 reviews): reviewers consistently describe it as easy enough that non-technical field staff use it without friction, which is a proxy for engagement even without a stated retention number.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bundlar/reviews"><strong>BUNDLAR</strong></a> (4.8 stars, 4 reviews): reviewers describe strong reactions the first time someone activates an AR experience, though this is described mostly in a marketing context rather than a training one, and the review count is small enough to treat as anecdotal.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who's actually tracked real engagement or retention numbers on one of these platforms internally: what did you measure, and did the AR format actually outperform whatever you were using before, or just feel more novel at first?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Help Lightning&#39;s ease of use for non-technical field staff is a real engagement signal even without a stated retention number, if people use something without friction, that&#39;s half the battle for adoption.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Is retention actually measured against a control group doing traditional training, or just against people&#39;s memory of how boring the old method felt?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The measure that separates novelty from value is time to competence on the specific task, assessed by whoever signs off, rather than completion or engagement rates. Engagement is exactly the metric novelty inflates, and it decays on a predictable curve as the format stops being new. Time to sign-off does not move for that reason. Given the post&#39;s own note that no review here reports a retention figure, a small internal comparison would be worth more than the category data: same procedure, two cohorts, one assessor. That is a few weeks of work and it settles the question for your own context.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

Flagging that these are engagement sentiments rather than measured retention is the right caution, since the two often diverge. 

See, AR reliably wins on novelty; the first headset session lands well almost everywhere, but novelty and durable knowledge retention are different things, and the second one is what actually justifies the spend. If you&#39;re measuring internally, the signal worth watching is whether engagement holds on the second and third use once the novelty fades, and whether people who trained in AR make fewer errors on the real task later, which tells you far more than a first-session reaction does.


##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4