RDS has been a game-changer for our database management. It's reliable, scalable, and takes the hassle out of backups, patching, and high availability. The performance is consistently solid, and the integration with other AWS services is seamless. It's the best choice for anyone looking to offload the heavy lifting of managing a relational database. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost Can Escalate Quickly.Slow Snapshot Restore Times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing about AWS Cloud is its scalability and flexibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While basic support is free, advanced support plans can be expensive, especially for small teams or startups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Ability to scale up and scale down seamlessly

2. The fact that it's managed and we don't need to maintain the infrusctucure. We only concentrate on business logic and database schema

3. It supports both SQL Server and Posgres technologies that we use

4. It's very easy to implement and pilot different solutions that we need

5. the fact we can use it on-demand making it OPEX. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not cheap, but we maintain it as a cost of running smooth business Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Signing up with Amazon RDS is relatively easy and there are so many features that are offered. The backup is automated while the architecture can be scaled and replication is managed automating the complexity of the database out of the user’s way. It is a set package solution with those necessary features that increase dependence and productivity for organizations. It has very fast implementation and has good support to customers. Using frequently. It is relatively easy to integrate with other . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Amazon RDS is a friendly user but its underlying infrastructure is not accessible in advanced configuration. But at the same time, the extensive feature set is a positive, but ties in with a negative — cost, especially for large workloads. RDS is a great answer for the large majority of your needs, however, it may be limited in its flexibility should you need to create something more complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Incredibly reliable RDS. Easy to integrate and implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It can get incredibly expensive very quickly, opposed to spinning up your own Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best about AWS service is that::

1)AWS provides very vast services related to storage , servers, firewalls, networking , security .

2)AWS has good scalability, cost effective , it has good flexibilty .

its has different regions and has good availabity zones which helps with latency issues.

3)AWS provides good security for cloud it has Identity Access Management system , where datas can be protected and different users can be provided with different access and policies.

4)AWS has good security compliance.

5)AWS provided good intergartion when in comes in terms of migration and while deployment of different application using AWS services its lot easier.

6)AWS provides good documentation on its services .

7)AWS cloud provided proper updates on its services and if any new services are included proper webinars are conducted and the process and serices are explained. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Only the thing i dislike about AWS is naming of its services its not easier to find a service related to a particular search and naming its terms .

like example suppose S3 any new fresher wont be able to identify it as a storage service and the related term bucket it should have something named related to storage.

like other services like lightsail we wont know it is severless if you are a fresher. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy configuration and initial set up. Scalability is the big plus point here. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Limited admin access, you don't get full sysadmin rights and certain functions are unavailable via SSMS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is truly a very flexible, powerful, scalable and full of features as AWS claims. I have using the service, including many others, in my organization since I joined, and it has served many production use -cases quite efficiently.

The best thing about Amazon RDS is it's combination of simplicity and power. Be the intuitive design on the console or the powerful CLI commands which were able to automate everything that I liked and wanted, this database is a great option for anyone looking either to migrate their on-premises databases, or choose a cloud database.

The ability AWS provides regarding scaling to up or down sizes on -demans is very good, which not only helps to meet the live customer API calls, but also helps us to manage and reduce our cost.

Even though we utilised the RDS for MySQL, MS SQL and PostGre SQL, the integration with other databases like MariaDB and more is quite appreciative, that enables us to work on projects for some customers using unconventional databases too.

I also loved the ease of connecting it to an EC2 instances whole creating the database itself, and how AWS manages many things automatically. Also, the option of managing the database credentials using Systems Manager for safety and security purpose, and ensuring nothing goes leaked is a very amazing feature as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't feel something too strong to dislike about Amazon RDS, but there are certain things where improvements can surely happen. One of them and what I feel, most important, is the proper integration of RDS databases to other identity providers like Microsoft Entra, Okta etc. If the credentials can totally be removed using this seamless integration, then it will truly complete even further use cases, and Excel on the security side better.

Also, Amazon RDS can fasten the application of patches/updates on our database as soon as they are released, so that we are always ahead in the update race as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's vast size of data storage and customer support. No chance of data lost and mismatch till now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's costing and pricing which is quite expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I guess Postgres is the one which is way more helpful and trendy these days especially using libraries for distance and geo spatial data support with Relational database advantages of Joins and Aggregate functions it is really good without any headache of having to maintain the server. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would say cost for few people who wants to have a POC kindof project it is very easy and goto service like DynamoDB but because of Cost RDS is kindof neglected because using EC2 if we host postgre rds it would be much cheaper Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.