# What is the best zero trust solution for securing office network?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Unlike remote-first setups, office networks involve shared infrastructure, internal traffic, and a mix of managed and unmanaged devices. If you’re looking for the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/zero-trust-networking">best zero-trust solution to secure an office network</a>, the tools that stand out are those that can enforce device-level trust, user authentication, and segmented access within the network itself. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">That’s where FortiClient, Cisco Duo, Zscaler Private Access, and Absolute Secure Access excel.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/forticlient/reviews">FortiClient</a> (G2: 4.4/5 | 270+ reviews): Often used for endpoint security and secure connectivity, helping ensure that only trusted devices can access the network. It’s practical for managing office devices at scale.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-duo/reviews">Cisco Duo</a> (G2: 4.5/5 | 490+ reviews): Adds a strong layer of identity verification, making sure users are authenticated before accessing internal systems, even within the office network.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zscaler-private-access/reviews">Zscaler Private Access</a> (G2: 4.4/5 | 130+ reviews): Shifts access from network-based to application-level control, reducing the risk of lateral movement inside the network. It’s more advanced but aligns closely with zero-trust principles.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/absolute-secure-access/reviews">Absolute Secure Access</a> (G2: 4.7/5 | 220+ reviews): Focuses on endpoint resilience and secure connectivity, helping maintain control over devices even if they’re compromised or leave the network.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">In an office environment, what actually reduces risk more: stricter device control, stronger user authentication, or limiting access between internal systems?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 21 giorni fa
- Author title: Marketer and Business Owner
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Cosa ha effettivamente ridotto il rischio più rapidamente nella tua configurazione, un&#39;autenticazione più forte o la limitazione del movimento laterale all&#39;interno della rete?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 giorni fa
- Author title: Marketer and Business Owner





## Related discussions
- [Quanto bene si adatta Trello a un team più grande?](https://www.g2.com/it/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: quasi 13 anni fa
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/it/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: quasi 13 anni fa
  - Comments: 0
- [Benefici quantificabili dall&#39;implementazione del tuo CRM](https://www.g2.com/it/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: quasi 13 anni fa
  - Comments: 4