# Who has the best whiteboard platform for a small team running quick brainstorms vs. an enterprise team running structured design sprints?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm comparing <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/collaborative-whiteboard">collaborative whiteboard platforms</a> specifically across a small team running quick, informal brainstorms and an enterprise team running structured, multi-stage design sprints.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fig-jam/reviews"><strong>FigJam</strong></a> skews toward smaller teams in its review base, with reviewers describing it as flexible enough for quick ideation sessions without much setup, living side by side with Figma for design teams that want to move fast.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mural/reviews"><strong>Mural</strong></a> shows up heavily with enterprise reviewers, built around expert-designed methods and customizable templates by role or function, with integrations into Salesforce, Microsoft, and Jira that matter more once a sprint spans multiple departments.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews"><strong>Miro</strong></a> spans both ends, though one reviewer specifically flagged that full-feature pricing tiers can be steep for a small team of two to five people, suggesting the sweet spot leans toward teams that can absorb enterprise-level pricing.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For small teams that eventually needed to run something closer to a structured sprint, did you upgrade within the same tool, or find yourselves reaching for a completely different platform once the process got more formal?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Collaborative Whiteboard reviews on G2 for the brainstorm-versus-sprint split describe review base skew as a useful signal on its own, not just a demographic detail. FigJam&#39;s smaller-team skew and low-setup flexibility fit quick, informal brainstorming well, while Mural&#39;s heavy enterprise skew and integrations into Salesforce, Microsoft, and Jira only really pay off once a sprint spans multiple departments that already live inside those systems.
Miro spanning both ends is worth reading carefully rather than taking as a universal fit, since the one reviewer specifically flagging steep pricing for a team of two to five people suggests Miro&#39;s actual sweet spot leans toward the enterprise side despite marketing itself as flexible for any size. For a small team that eventually needs something closer to Mural&#39;s structured, multi-stage process, the post&#39;s own question about upgrading within the same tool versus switching entirely is probably best answered by whether that small team can absorb Miro&#39;s or Mural&#39;s pricing at all, since cost might force the switch before the process complexity does.


##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4