# Which recognition software simplifies employee nomination collection from distributed teams across global organizations?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Collecting nominations from distributed teams across time zones, languages, and organizational structures creates unique challenges. The <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/awards-management">Awards Management</a> category on G2 features platforms evaluated by organizations managing exactly this complexity. Award Force leads the overall Grid, while Judgify tops the small-business segment.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/award-force/reviews"><strong>Award Force</strong></a> (4.7/5 stars, 290 reviews): Reviewers from global organizations describe branded nomination portals that maintain consistent branding while accommodating region-specific fields and requirements. The multi-language support allows distributed teams to submit nominations in their preferred language, and reviewers note the time zone handling prevents confusion around submission deadlines. The platform's notification engine keeps nominators informed of status changes regardless of their location.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/submittable/reviews"><strong>Submittable</strong></a> (4.5/5 stars, 168 reviews): Organizations with globally distributed teams describe the platform's form builder as flexible enough to create region-specific nomination pathways while feeding into a centralized review process. Reviewers appreciate the mobile-responsive submission experience that works well for field employees and remote teams, and multiple reviewers mention that the collaborative review features support geographically dispersed judging panels.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews"><strong>Submit.com</strong></a> (4.8/5 stars, 106 reviews): Reviewers from distributed organizations consistently highlight the platform's clean submission interface as a factor in higher completion rates from remote teams. The form logic allows conditional fields based on the submitter's region or division, reducing friction for nominators who only see relevant questions. Several reviewers note the platform requires essentially no training for employees submitting nominations.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/evalato/reviews"><strong>Evalato</strong></a> (4.8/5 stars, 64 reviews): Reviewers collecting nominations across organizational boundaries describe the platform's ability to create distinct entry points for different teams while maintaining unified evaluation criteria. The drag-and-drop form builder accommodates varied submission requirements, and reviewers note that the built-in communication tools help coordinate across distributed stakeholders without relying on external email chains.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What has been the biggest hurdle in collecting nominations from distributed teams? Is it the technology, employee awareness, or manager engagement?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Award Force and Submit.com both score well on lowering friction for remote nominators, but the actual hurdle is often manager engagement and employee awareness, not the technology. A clean submission interface helps, but if managers aren&#39;t encouraging nominations, the platform features don&#39;t matter.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Award Force&#39;s time zone handling actually preventing confusion around submission deadlines is a small detail that would matter a lot in practice, since that&#39;s exactly the kind of thing that quietly causes missed nominations across a distributed team.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Manager engagement would probably be the hardest hurdle for me. The nomination form can be frictionless, but participation still drops if managers aren’t actively encouraging submissions across regions and teams. I’d want automated reminders and visibility into nomination rates by division or geography so organizers can spot underrepresented groups before the window closes.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago



### Comment 4

Evalato&#39;s built-in communication tools keeping coordination within the platform rather than spilling into external email chains is something I wish more tools did well. The moment nomination coordination moves into inboxes you lose visibility, and getting it back requires manual reconciliation that nobody has time for during an active program.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4