# Which Quote-to-Cash software enables accurate revenue recognition and ASC 606 compliance for a finance team that cannot afford to get deferred revenue reporting wrong?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We're exploring how finance teams handle the revenue recognition side of quote-to-cash, where getting deferred revenue or ASC 606 reporting wrong isn't an option. The question is which quote-to-cash software reliably supports accurate revenue recognition and ASC 606 compliance for a finance team under that kind of pressure. What I'm hoping to find:</p><ul>
<li>Revenue recognition that runs off the same data as quoting and billing, not a separate re-entry</li>
<li>Automation that reduces manual work on deferred revenue schedules</li>
<li>Reporting a finance team can trust and audit</li>
<li>Room to scale as subscription and usage models get more complex</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A couple of tools from the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/quote-to-cash">Quote-to-Cash</a> category that reviewers connect to this:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zuora-zuora/reviews"><strong>Zuora</strong></a>: A reviewer described strong flexibility in subscription billing and revenue recognition, with automation cutting manual work as the business scales.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/agentforce-revenue-management-formerly-salesforce-revenue-cloud/reviews"><strong>Agentforce Revenue Management (formerly Salesforce Revenue Cloud)</strong></a>: Reviewers say a unified CPQ-to-billing platform with real-time reporting reduces errors in complex revenue workflows and keeps the numbers consistent.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For finance folks, is your revenue recognition running inside your quote-to-cash platform, or handed off to a separate accounting tool? And if you went through an ASC 606 implementation, what did you wish the software did better on deferred revenue?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

Keeping revenue recognition on the same data as quoting and billing removes the re-entry, which is the case reviewers make for running it inside the platform rather than a separate accounting tool. Zuora gets cited for ASC 606 and deferred-revenue automation, though the caveat is that reporting flexibility can need extra tooling.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4