# Which purchasing solutions are most reliable based on real implementation success and user satisfaction?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">To close out my <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/purchasing-software">purchasing software</a> research, I looked at reliability through the lens of satisfaction scores and reviewers describing implementations that actually landed. If you want the short version, ProcurementExpress.com, PRMAI and Spendwise carry the highest satisfaction of this set, but here is the fuller list.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/procurementexpress-com/reviews"><strong>ProcurementExpress.com</strong></a> gets described by reviewers as a smooth rollout with consistent day-to-day use, with little to fault beyond occasional slow search.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/prmai/reviews"><strong>PRMAI</strong></a> carries the highest average rating in this group, with reviewers calling it a dependable partner that delivers consistently; its base is mostly enterprise and India-based.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/spendwise/reviews"><strong>Spendwise</strong></a> draws credit for dependable support and easy adoption, with the structure and accountability that reviewers say stuck after rollout.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zip-2024-02-26/reviews"><strong>Zip</strong></a> has reviewers reporting strong adoption and quantifiable results after implementation, with reporting export as the main gap.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/order-co/reviews"><strong>Order.co</strong></a> gets described as reliable order tracking with easy onboarding, and a busy reporting view as the tradeoff.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the people who have lived with one of these for a while: which held up as reliable well past go-live, and which looked good in a demo but wobbled in practice? Curious what "reliable" means most to you, uptime, support, or predictable workflows.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

&quot;Looked good in a demo but wobbled in practice&quot; is basically the story of every procurement software evaluation I&#39;ve ever been part of. I think reliability for most teams ends up meaning support more than uptime, because when something breaks or a workflow acts weird, how fast someone actually responds matters a lot. Uptime is table stakes at this point, it&#39;s the &quot;what happens when things go wrong&quot; that separates tools after a year of use.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4