# Which PR analytics platforms have sentiment analysis that actually reflects how your audience feels rather than just counting mentions as positive or negative at random?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hoping to get a read from the people who review and research this space, because this is the claim I trust least in demos. Which PR analytics platform has sentiment analysis scoring that reflects how audiences actually feel than just counting mentions as positive or negative?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Every platform in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/pr-analytics"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/pr-analytics">PR analytics</a> category says its sentiment analysis is accurate. Then you run a sarcastic tweet or an article that praises your competitor while mentioning you, and you find out what "accurate" meant. I don’t want tools whose analysis is just coin-flip tagging with a dashboard on top. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Three names come up most for accuracy-first pitch: Meltwater for entity-level scoring, CisionOne for granularity, Agility PR Solutions for its accuracy-first pitch:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/meltwater/reviews">Meltwater</a> scores sentiment per entity, not per article, so a piece praising your competitor and knocking you doesn't average out to "neutral." User corrections feed back into retraining the models. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cisionone/reviews">CisionOne</a> uses a five-point scale instead of positive/negative/neutral, manual overrides, and a React Score that runs multiple NLP models for harm and controversy signals. Honest flag: its overall satisfaction scores sit at the bottom of this group on the G2 grid.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/agility-pr-solutions/reviews">Agility PR Solutions</a> leads with sentiment accuracy as the pitch, tracking sentiment trends in real time across earned and social, with mention characterization beyond a bare polarity tag. Managed-service analysts are available when the automated read isn't enough.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the G2 software reviewers and experts here: which of these would you put in front of a CMO without hand-checking the tags first?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;If I had to hand one of these to a CMO untouched, it&#39;d be Agility PR Solutions, mostly because of the managed-service analysts behind the automated read. A person available when the model&#39;s unsure feels like a real safety net. It&#39;s a different kind of confidence than a purely automated score, since there&#39;s someone accountable for the read rather than just a number with nothing behind it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;Meltwater would be the one I’d feel most comfortable putting in front of a CMO, mainly because entity-level sentiment is a stronger safeguard against misleading article-level scoring. I’d still spot-check high-impact mentions, but it seems less likely to distort the overall read.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;I’d pressure-test sentiment with a small benchmark set before trusting any dashboard. Sarcasm, mixed sentiment, quoted criticism, and articles mentioning multiple brands are good cases because simple polarity models tend to struggle there. For anyone using Meltwater or CisionOne, how often do analysts still manually override sentiment before the results reach leadership?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;The platform I would trust most is the one that lets me click from a sentiment trend into the underlying mentions, understand why they were classified that way, and correct the model when it gets them wrong. A polished score without that traceability is still risky to put in front of leadership.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4