# Which paid search intelligence software has the best combination of data depth and easy reporting for agencies managing multiple PPC accounts simultaneously?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The aim here is to find which paid search intelligence software gives agencies the best mix of data depth and fast, client-ready reporting when they're running several PPC accounts at once, where the reporting overhead across accounts is as much the problem as the data itself. The three that come up most for that are Semrush, SE Ranking, and SpyFu, from the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/paid-search-intelligence">Paid Search Intelligence</a> category.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/semrush/reviews"><strong>Semrush</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 4,016 reviews) is favored by agency reviewers for pairing deep keyword and competitor data with exports that are straightforward to explain to clients, which they credit with cutting reporting time. Reviewers note plan limits can push growing agencies up a tier.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/se-ranking/reviews"><strong>SE Ranking</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 1,578 reviews) is built with agencies in mind, and reviewers highlight white-label reporting and extended client-seat capacity for managing a portfolio without overhead scaling at the same pace. Reviewers ask for more enterprise reporting as portfolios grow.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/spyfu/reviews"><strong>SpyFu</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 518 reviews) is valued for automated client reports that agencies find easy to read and useful for pitching and retention, alongside competitor ad and keyword data. Reviewers mention gaps in niche categories.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Across accounts, does more time go to data collection or report formatting? And do your clients want white-label deliverables or raw dashboards?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve found the white-label question is really the fork in the road here. When clients see the reports directly, I&#39;d lean toward SE Ranking since not having to rebuild a branded template for every new account saves real time. If I&#39;m mostly reporting internally or to clients who just want the numbers, I&#39;d care less about white-labeling and more about which tool cuts down actual data-pulling time, since formatting a clean report is fast, but wrangling messy exports across five accounts is what eats a Monday morning.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


