# Which location marketing platforms are most reliable for retail property managers who need to protect customer privacy?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hoping to get a read from the property and centre-management folks who review these tools.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"> Which location marketing platforms are actually reliable for retail property managers who have to protect customer privacy, across tenants they don't control?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A property manager's privacy problem is different from a retailer's. The shopper never signed up with you. They signed up with a tenant, or with nobody, and you're measuring the concourse anyway. The tools people usually hear about here, Foursquare and Placer.ai, buy third-party movement data and sit in G2's location intelligence category. For the platforms in this category, the checks I'd want:</p><ul>
<li>Consent visible to the shopper at the moment of capture, not buried in an app policy</li>
<li>Data retention you can set and shorten, with deletion on request</li>
<li>Vendor certifications you can name: SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR documentation</li>
<li>Tenant separation: a retailer sees its own data, not the centre's</li>
<li>Aggregated counts by default, with identified data only where the shopper opted in</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">From the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/location-based-marketing"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/location-based-marketing">Location-Based Marketing Software</a> category on G2, four that answer those differently:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/purple/reviews"><strong>Purple</strong></a> (4.2/5, 35+ reviews): Guest and multi-tenant Wi-Fi from one platform, with consent collected at a branded login where the shopper sees the trade. Trade-off: analytics only cover people who log in.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/radar-labs-inc-radar/reviews"><strong>Radar</strong></a> (4.7/5, 15+ reviews): SOC 2 and GDPR compliant with configurable retention and privacy controls, on 300M+ devices. Trade-off: an SDK, so it lives inside an app you or a tenant ships.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/m360/reviews"><strong>M360</strong></a> (4.7/5, 20+ reviews): Built for shopping centres, with proximity SMS and email to shoppers who subscribed to the centre itself. Trade-off: no anonymous footfall layer.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/flame-analytics/reviews"><strong>Flame Analytics</strong></a> (4.6/5, 75+ reviews): Top Security Compliance score in the category at 0.95, with venue analytics for physical spaces. Trade-off: chain-scale pricing.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What's the one privacy finding that made you drop a location vendor from a property shortlist?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Digging through the Location-Based Marketing category on G2, the property manager framing in the post is the detail worth sitting with, since the shopper never opted into a relationship with the property, only with a tenant or with nobody, which makes consent and tenant separation harder problems than a typical retailer&#39;s location marketing faces. Platforms built around visible, branded consent at the moment of capture solve a real piece of this, but they also only see the people who actually opt in, which means the anonymous footfall layer property managers often want has to come from somewhere else entirely. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Tenant separation is the check that&#39;s easy to overlook and hardest to verify from a G2 profile alone, since a retailer trusting that its data stays its own is a promise that lives in configuration and contract terms, not in a feature list. Given how thin and scattered the review evidence is across this category for the property-manager use case specifically, the finding that would actually change a shortlist is probably less about a feature gap and more about a vendor unable to clearly explain how tenant data gets walled off from the property&#39;s own view.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4