# Which health care credentialing solutions offer the best integration capabilities for existing systems?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been exploring which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/health-care-credentialing">health care credentialing</a> solutions offer the best integration capabilities for existing systems for a roundup I'm putting together, and this is where the vendor feature pages are least useful. They all say yes to integration. What varies significantly is whether that means pre-built connectors, API access, or "professional services will handle it for a fee."</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/medtrainer/reviews"><strong>MedTrainer</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Covers credentialing, policy management, training, and incident reporting in one platform; the breadth eliminates several external connection points entirely, which is what multi-location practices describe as reducing integration overhead. Does MedTrainer offer standard EHR connectors, or does the all-in-one approach primarily substitute for integrations rather than enable them?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/credentialstream/reviews"><strong>CredentialStream</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Provider onboarding tracking, payer approval, and recred tracking alongside automated primary source verifications all managed within the platform; the ability to manage PSV independently eliminates the need for a separate vendor contract and the integration that comes with it.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/verisys/reviews"><strong>Verisys</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Consolidates multiple verification lists into one platform; works collaboratively to solve data formatting and integration challenges specific to each organization's setup, with a long-term partnership approach to ongoing data issues.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/symplr-access/reviews"><strong>symplr Access</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Credential verification designed to connect vendor and provider credentialing with facility access control in one workflow; implementation described as easy and streamlined with a cooperative implementation team.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/inovalon-eligibility-verification/reviews"><strong>Inovalon Eligibility Verification</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Eligibility verification connecting insurance verification to credentialing and enrollment workflows for healthcare organizations.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who has integrated a credentialing platform with an existing EHR or compliance system: how much custom development was actually required, and did the vendor's integration support hold up through the connection process or end at the documentation handoff?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Verisys is the one I&#39;d name here. They worked through our data formatting mess rather than handing us documentation and wishing us luck, and the ongoing part matters because data problems in credentialing never fully stop.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 2

Also, just had to ask, does integration capability here mean pulling data from primary source verification services automatically, or does someone still manually re-enter what a verification service already confirmed?

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;From what I&#39;ve seen in the reviews, the all-in-one suites tend to sidestep the question by absorbing functions rather than connecting to them, which helps until you need to keep a system you already have. EHR is where the vague answers usually surface.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4