# Which Facility Management platforms track preventive maintenance and organize asset inventory effectively?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Preventive maintenance tracking and asset inventory organization are related but distinct capabilities; some platforms handle one well while treating the other as an afterthought. Within <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/facility-management">Facility Management</a>, here's what's documented on both together.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/limble/reviews"><strong>Limble</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers cite a 41% productivity boost from smart task scheduling, alongside built-in inventory management that cuts spare parts costs by 29%, with both working together rather than as separate modules.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/maintainx/reviews"><strong>MaintainX</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reports a 34% reduction in parts inventory costs alongside a 38% increase in equipment uptime, evidence that the preventive and inventory sides are genuinely connected in practice.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/akitabox/reviews"><strong>AkitaBox</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Combines asset management, maintenance management, and facility condition assessments in a single system, with digital floor-plan pins that tie inventory locations directly to the maintenance record.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For facilities teams running one of these, does the preventive schedule actually trigger from real asset condition data, or does it still run on a fixed calendar regardless of how the equipment is actually holding up?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The calendar-vs-condition question at the end cuts deep, and there&#39;s a reason most teams stay on the calendar even when the platform supports condition triggers: a calendar schedule survives bad data and a condition-based one doesn&#39;t. Meter-based PM only fires if someone actually logs the runtime hours or the sensor feed stays connected, and one lapsed month means the trigger silently never comes due, which is worse than an over-cautious calendar.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4