# Which ETO ERP integrates with SolidWorks and handles engineer change orders well for a manufacturer where engineering and production need to stay in sync?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which ETO ERP integrates with SolidWorks and handles engineer change orders well for a manufacturer where engineering and production need to stay in sync?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">This keeps coming up in research on the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/eto-erp">ETO ERP</a> category, and honestly, the vendor answers all sound the same. Everyone "integrates with SolidWorks." What actually matters is whether a change in engineering propagates into the production BOM automatically, or whether someone has to manually reconcile two different versions of the same document while a job is mid-build.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">From reviews where this specific friction point came up:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/total-eto/reviews"><strong>Total ETO</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers describe the SolidWorks integration as smooth and direct. Engineers release BOMs from within the CAD environment without re-entering data. One reviewer mentioned the add-in specifically as useful for transferring bill of material information straight from their models into the system, which is the core of what you would want here.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ecc/reviews"><strong>SAP ECC</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The ECO audit trail and cross-module change documentation are described as thorough. Reviewers can trace a transaction back through the entire process from purchase order to financial posting. The configuration required to get ETO-specific ECO workflows right is significant, and it usually needs skilled consultants to set up properly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infor-syteline/reviews"><strong>Infor SyteLine</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Used in manufacturing environments where multi-departmental handoffs are the main workflow bottleneck. Reviewers specifically credit the event and workflow automation for eliminating the white-space delays that happen when engineering finishes something and production does not yet know about it.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/epicor-kinetic/reviews"><strong>Kinetic</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers building custom machines describe job and parts visibility that flows through the system as work progresses. The configurator and Application Studio are called out for teams that need to shape the ECO process to match how their own engineering-to-production handoff actually works.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has anyone found a tool that ensures the change order actually reaches the shop floor before someone has already started building to the old revision?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Even when the ERP pushes the new revision to the floor instantly, the expensive part is usually what&#39;s already committed to the old one: the assemblies half-built, the parts already cut, the PO landing Tuesday for material you no longer need. So the capability that actually matters isn&#39;t notification speed, it&#39;s disposition, when a change drops mid-job, does the system flag which in-flight jobs and open POs are affected and let you decide per unit whether to rework, scrap, use as-is, or cut the change in at the next serial? A fast &quot;new rev&quot; alert that leaves you to find the committed work by hand has just moved the fire drill, not put it out. For anyone who&#39;s had a rev land mid-build, did your system actually surface the affected jobs and POs, or did someone have to go hunting?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


