# Which ERP systems are most trusted by finance directors based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hello G2 community, finance directors rarely decide whether an <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/erp-systems">ERP system</a> is trustworthy during the demo. That confidence usually develops after several closes, when consolidations balance, reports hold up under scrutiny, and support responds when a configuration problem affects the numbers.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The clearest takeaway from the reviews is that Sage Intacct has the widest finance-director evidence, Rillet has the strongest individual endorsement, and NetSuite has the longest-tenure signal. The amount of evidence behind each one differs considerably:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sage-intacct/reviews"><strong>Sage Intacct</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Thirteen reviewers had finance-director or closely related director titles. They frequently praised multi-entity consolidation, dimensional reporting, dashboards, permissions, and audit controls. Trust wasn’t unconditional, though. Some directors raised concerns about support, module costs, report formatting, and implementations that are difficult to correct later.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rillet/reviews"><strong>Rillet</strong></a><strong>:</strong> One director of finance described consolidating US and India entities without manual work holding the process together. The same reviewer reported less reconciliation work, movement toward a continuous close, and responsive support that continued after implementation. It’s compelling feedback, but one exact-role review isn’t enough to establish a broad consensus.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-netsuite/reviews"><strong>NetSuite</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Its exact-match finance director had used the platform for seven years and trusted it to house the company’s financials. Easy navigation was a positive, while cumbersome report creation and weaker AI capabilities were the main frustrations. Would that reporting effort become a larger issue as the finance team’s requirements grow?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For finance directors who have worked through several year-end closes with these systems, which trust signal matters most: consolidation accuracy, audit controls, reporting flexibility, or reliable support? At what point did you know the platform could replace your finance team’s spreadsheet checks?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For me, the real trust test would be what happens when finance stops maintaining parallel spreadsheet checks. For teams using Sage Intacct, Rillet, or NetSuite, was there a point when you were comfortable relying entirely on the ERP for consolidation and reporting? I’d be especially interested in what finally made finance confident enough to retire those manual reconciliation checks.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4