# Which employee recognition tools meet SOC 2 or GDPR compliance standards for companies in regulated industries or with EU-based employees?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Researching the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/employee-recognition">employee recognition software</a> category on G2 to meet SOC 2 or GDPR compliance standards for companies in regulated industries or with EU-based employees, this question is harder to answer than it should be. Most product pages mention compliance in passing, but reviewers in financial services, healthcare, and companies with European operations tend to be the most specific about what the platform actually supports.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We're hoping to find something that's:</p><ul>
<li>SOC 2 Type II certified, not just "working toward" it</li>
<li>GDPR-compliant with data residency options for EU employees</li>
<li>Clear on data retention and deletion policies without requiring a legal review of the vendor contract to understand them</li>
<li>Transparent about subprocessor relationships (especially relevant for global reward fulfillment)</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here are a few platforms that come up when researching this angle:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/workhuman-social-recognition/reviews"><strong>Workhuman Social Recognition</strong></a>: Enterprise reviewers in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) call it out for its compliance documentation and the attention paid to data handling in enterprise contracts. Its market presence score on the enterprise Grid (98) reflects the depth of large-organization adoption where compliance requirements are non-negotiable.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/culture-cloud-by-o-c-tanner/reviews"><strong>Culture Cloud by O.C. Tanner</strong></a>: Comes up in reviews from global enterprises specifically for supporting multi-country deployments in ways that account for regional data requirements, not just a blanket global policy applied uniformly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/achievers/reviews"><strong>Achievers</strong></a>: Enterprise reviewers in HR and compliance functions mention that Achievers has the security documentation that larger legal and procurement teams expect before approving a vendor, which accelerates internal sign-off compared to tools that require back-and-forth on compliance questionnaires.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vantage-circle/reviews"><strong>Vantage Circle</strong></a>: Reviewers from organizations with international employee bases note Vantage Circle's attention to regional compliance in how it handles employee data across different geographies, which matters when EU-based employees are part of a global program.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you've gone through procurement and security review for a recognition platform at a company in a regulated space, what did the vendor's compliance documentation actually look like? Were SOC 2 reports and DPAs readily available, or did it take multiple rounds of back-and-forth?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The subprocessor point in your wish list is the one people forget, based on my analysis. Global reward fulfillment usually means employee data is shared with third parties, and that&#39;s where GDPR gets thorny. I feel &quot;SOC 2 Type II now, not in progress&quot; is the right bar to hold. Whether the DPA and reports were actually ready or took rounds of chasing is the real signal of how a vendor treats compliance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4