# Which EHR do practice administrators trust to keep billing and reporting running smoothly across multiple providers?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Clinicians and office administrators tend to want different things out of <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ehr">EHR Software</a>. A provider cares about charting speed, but an administrator is looking at claims tracking, reporting, and how painful it is to onboard new staff. I filtered reviews down to administrators specifically to see what actually holds up from that side of the desk.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/modmed/reviews"><strong>ModMed</strong></a>: administrators say scheduling, charts, and patient info sitting in one system genuinely speeds up daily operations, and more than one review mentions same day note finalization freeing up staff time. Best for specialty practices that want clinical and admin work under one login.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nextgen-healthcare-ehr/reviews"><strong>NextGen Healthcare EHR</strong></a>: reviewers point to strong claims tracking and auto posted payments as real time savers, though the admin settings and provider setup take some getting used to. Best for multi location practices that need centralized reporting across sites.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews"><strong>eClinicalWorks</strong></a>: admins mention it's genuinely easy to train new hires on, with one reviewer calling implementation streamlined after using it since 2008. Is that long term familiarity actually a selling point, or does it just mean people stop looking at alternatives?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For administrators managing more than one provider on the same system, which of these actually cut down your reporting time versus just moving the busywork somewhere else?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;EHR reviews on G2 filtered to administrators specifically tell a different story than reviews filtered to clinicians would. ModMed and NextGen both show up here for reasons that matter to an administrator&#39;s actual workload, unified charts and patient info reducing daily friction, and strong claims tracking with auto-posted payments cutting down reconciliation work, neither of which is really about how fast a provider can chart during a visit. eClinicalWorks&#39; long tenure showing up as an ease-of-training advantage raises a fair question the post itself asks, whether that familiarity is a real strength or just a reason staff stopped evaluating alternatives, and that distinction probably only becomes clear if an administrator actually runs a side-by-side comparison rather than assuming years of use equals ongoing fit.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;NextGen&#39;s admin settings and provider setup, needing real getting-used-to is worth weighing against its claims-tracking strength, since a tool that saves time once configured but costs real setup time upfront trades one kind of administrator burden for another rather than eliminating it. The post&#39;s own question about cutting reporting time versus moving the busywork somewhere else is the right test for any of these, since a system that centralizes data but still requires an administrator to manually reconcile it across providers hasn&#39;t actually solved the multi-provider problem, just relocated it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4