# Which construction collaboration tools integrated with Autodesk Construction Cloud eliminate email transmittals and create a single source of truth for project data?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for reviewers and researchers evaluating Autodesk Construction Cloud: Which construction collaboration tools that integrate with Autodesk Construction Cloud actually eliminate email transmittals and create a single source of truth for project data?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here's the problem. Getting off email isn't one job, it's three:</p><ul>
<li>emailing files back and forth</li>
<li>emailing marked-up drawings</li>
<li>emailing RFIs and submittals</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">ACC (Autodesk Docs) is meant to be the one place it all lives, but all three still happen over email. Three partners on the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/autodesk-construction-cloud-integration-partners"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/autodesk-construction-cloud-integration-partners">Autodesk Construction Cloud integration partners</a> list each fix one of them.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/egnyte/reviews"><strong>Egnyte</strong></a> is for the files. Secure links replace email attachments, with one permissioned home and version history so nobody works off an old copy.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bluebeam/reviews"><strong>Bluebeam</strong></a> is for the markups. Studio Sessions put the whole team on one live set of drawings, with markups and revisions tracked, instead of mailing PDFs around. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/newforma-project-center/reviews"><strong>Newforma Project Center</strong></a> is for the RFIs and submittals. Reviewers file them, and their transmittals, out of personal inboxes into the project record, so a decision doesn't vanish when someone leaves.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The tool you add depends on which habit is hurting you: files, markups, or transmittals. For anyone making ACC the single source of truth, which of these usually stops the latest-version-lives-in-the-inbox problem, and which habit refuses to die?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

On the governance point specifically, naming one owner for each of the three habits, files, markups, and transmittals, tends to matter more than the tool choice itself. Without someone accountable for each, at least one of the three quietly drifts back to email within a few months.


##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

Markups were the habit that died first for us once Bluebeam Studio Sessions were in place, because there&#39;s no reason to mail a PDF when everyone is on the same live set. Transmittals were the stubborn one, and that only shifted when Newforma made the project record the default place they landed.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Your framing is fair—no single integration eliminates every email workflow. Egnyte, Bluebeam, and Newforma each address a different collaboration gap, while ACC remains the central system of record. In practice, success depends as much on consistent team adoption and governance as on the integration itself.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4