# Which auditing services platforms integrate seamlessly with existing enterprise systems and workflow tools?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, compliance and audit folks on G2, this one's for you. I'm trying to work out which auditing services platforms genuinely integrate with the enterprise systems and workflow tools a team already runs. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been going through the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/auditing-services"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/auditing-services">auditing services</a> category on G2 with a short wish list for what integrates seamlessly means: </p><ul>
<li>Works natively with the compliance automation platform you already run (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, or similar) so evidence flows straight through, no duplicate uploads</li>
<li>A live status view the whole team can check</li>
<li>Doesn't force abandoning workflows for the auditor's proprietary portal</li>
<li>Room to grow from SOC 2 into other frameworks without re-platforming</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A few we've been researching on G2 against that list:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/insight-assurance/reviews"><strong>Insight Assurance</strong></a> has the longest platform partner list: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Hyperproof, OneTrust, TrustCloud, Carbide, Ostendio. Breadth is the draw; the focus is security and compliance frameworks, so financial-statement audit work isn't what you'd come here for.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/johanson-group/reviews"><strong>Johanson Group</strong></a> works across Secureframe, Vanta, and Drata, and serves as the independent audit firm for Rippling's automated compliance platform. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sensiba-llp/reviews"><strong>Sensiba LLP</strong></a> sits in both Drata's auditor directory and Vanta's partner network, and because it's a full accounting firm, SOC work can live alongside broader assurance and tax. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kpmg/reviews"><strong>KPMG</strong></a> is the opposite bet. Rather than plugging into your tools, it brings its own: the Clara audit platform, with a client collaboration portal and analytics over your data. Enterprise-grade, but the workflow is theirs, not yours, and the engagement model is priced like it.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What's <em>not</em> on this list that should be? And if one of these had you doing double data entry anyway, I'd like to hear that even more.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Integration with existing workflow tools for an auditing service usually gets tested hardest when evidence needs to be pulled from multiple systems at once, not when everything lives conveniently in one place.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;One more distinction I’d make is evidence flowing into the audit versus findings flowing back out. Pulling evidence automatically solves only half the workflow if remediation tasks then have to be recreated manually in the compliance platform. The strongest integration would keep evidence, findings, owners, and remediation status synchronized in both directions.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;The biggest red flag would be any “integration” that still leaves your team manually re-uploading evidence or reconciling status across two systems. I’d favor the firm that works inside the compliance platform you already use and keeps one source of truth for evidence and audit progress.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 4

KPMG bringing its own platform rather than plugging into yours is the key distinction to weigh here. Clara gives you a client portal, but the workflow is theirs. For teams already running Vanta or Drata, Insight Assurance or Johanson Group keeping evidence flows inside your existing dashboard is a meaningfully different engagement model.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4