# Which Acumatica consulting partners are experienced with non-standard ERP migrations from legacy systems without extended data cleanup?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which Acumatica consulting partners are experienced with non-standard ERP migrations from legacy systems without extended data cleanup? Migrating from older or less common ERP platforms introduces unique challenges around data mapping, historical transaction preservation, and field-level compatibility. In the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/acumatica-consulting-ffe98fcd-3853-44cc-a547-92d69dd966db">Acumatica Consulting</a> category, Crestwood Associates, Blytheco, DSD Business Systems, and NexTec Group have reviewer feedback addressing migration expertise.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/crestwood-associates/reviews"><strong>Crestwood Associates</strong></a> has experience migrating clients from a variety of legacy ERP platforms to Acumatica. Reviewers describe the firm's data migration methodology as thorough, with dedicated resources for mapping source data structures to Acumatica's schema. Clients coming from older systems note that Crestwood's team developed custom import routines that handled non-standard data formats without requiring the client to manually clean and reformat their historical data before migration.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/blytheco/reviews"><strong>Blytheco</strong></a> leverages its extensive Acumatica implementation history to handle migrations from diverse source systems. Reviewers describe migration projects where Blytheco's team built automated data transformation scripts that converted legacy data structures into Acumatica-compatible formats. Clients note that the firm's experience with a wide range of source systems meant fewer surprises during the migration process, since consultants had often encountered similar data challenges before.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/dsd-business-systems/reviews"><strong>DSD Business Systems</strong></a> brings technical depth to data migration projects, with reviewers highlighting the firm's ability to handle complex historical data transfers. Clients describe migrations where DSD's team preserved transaction history, customer records, and inventory data from legacy systems that lacked standard export capabilities. The firm's technical staff is noted for writing custom extraction tools when source systems didn't offer clean data export options.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nextec-group/reviews"><strong>NexTec Group</strong></a> approaches migrations with industry-specific knowledge that reviewers say helps anticipate which legacy data is critical to preserve. Construction and manufacturing clients describe migrations where NexTec's team prioritized job history, cost records, and vendor payment history based on the firm's understanding of what data drives day-to-day operations in those industries.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What legacy system did you migrate from, and how did your consulting partner handle the data transition? Were there specific data types that proved more challenging to migrate than expected?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

DSD Business Systems writing custom extraction tools when a source system doesn&#39;t offer clean export options is exactly the kind of capability that matters for a genuinely non-standard migration, since the easy migrations rarely need that level of custom work in the first place.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

The decision that drives this timeline more than the source system does is how much history you bring across. Open items plus opening balances is a comparatively contained exercise. Full transaction history means every legacy quirk has to map to the new chart and dimension structure, including years where your own coding conventions were different. Many teams land on the middle answer, migrating open items live and keeping the legacy system read-only for historical enquiry. Worth asking each partner which they recommend and why, since one that defaults to full history without asking about your reporting needs may be scoping the larger project by habit.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;DSD Business Systems writing custom extraction tools for source systems that didn&#39;t offer clean export options is the detail that would matter most to me, since that&#39;s usually where a migration timeline quietly blows up.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;The DSD Business Systems detail about writing custom extraction tools when source systems didn&#39;t offer clean data export options is the capability that almost never gets asked about in the vendor selection process but becomes critical when the migration starts. Legacy systems that have been running for 15 years without consistent data governance rarely export cleanly, and a consulting team that can write around that limitation saves months of manual remediation.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4