# What visual configuration software is best for sales reps using tablets in the field who need to show customers live product configurations with offline support?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hello G2 users, the offline half of this question needs saying up front: recent reviews across <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/visual-configuration">visual configuration software</a> don't test offline use at all, so any offline claim you hear is a vendor claim until you watch it work with the connection off. With that stated, what visual configuration software is best for sales reps using tablets in the field who need to show customers live product configurations with offline support? Sorted by field-sales fit in the available evidence, the short list looks like this:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/threekit-threekit/reviews"><strong>Threekit</strong></a>: The only vendor I found naming field sales explicitly, with mobile support for in-home and field reps and configuration flows built for a rep standing in front of a customer who needs budgetary pricing on the spot (vendor-stated). Recent reviews confirm 3D assets performing well on phones and tablets, which is the load-bearing requirement here. Offline behavior isn't covered by review evidence, so make it the first demo condition.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kickflip-kickflip/reviews"><strong>Kickflip</strong></a>: The one product with device-specific review feedback: recent reviews describe on-screen customization and approval working well on computer and iPad, with the phone version trailing both. For tablet-based field reps specifically, that's a direct, if accidental, endorsement of the form factor, though it's an ecommerce customizer at heart, so the fit is consumer products, not industrial equipment.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/epicor-cpq/reviews"><strong>Epicor CPQ</strong></a>: The manufacturer option positioned for configuring anytime, anywhere with reps, distributors, and partners among its stated users (vendor-stated). With no recent reviews, treat the field workflow as a reference-call question: ask to speak with a customer whose reps actually quote on tablets.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/combeenation/reviews"><strong>Combeenation</strong></a>: Included as the honest counterexample: its recent review feedback names time savings in customer consulting, which is field-sales value, and simultaneously flags no mobile version, which for this question is disqualifying today and worth rechecking on their roadmap.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">In the demo, load the configurator on the actual tablet model your reps carry, turn off the connection, configure a product, and reconnect. If the vendor hesitates at that request, no review will rescue them, because nobody has written the review that proves it works. Field reps, what actually kills your in-person demos today, connectivity, load times, or the configurator just not being built for touch?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The offline question probably needs answering before the product question does. If nobody&#39;s actually tested a vendor&#39;s configurator with the connection off, the shortlist is really a guess dressed up as a comparison, and that&#39;s worth saying plainly before a team builds a rollout plan around it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;Worth splitting offline into two questions, because they get very different answers. Caching geometry and textures on the device is reasonably straightforward, so showing the product with no signal is achievable. Pricing and availability are live lookups against someone&#39;s ERP, and those are the parts that can&#39;t work offline without a stale local copy somebody has to take responsibility for. So in practice, offline usually means you can show it and not quote it. Threekit being positioned around giving a rep budgetary pricing on the spot is interesting because &quot;budgetary&quot; is doing real work in that sentence: a cached price range is defensible in a way a cached firm quote isn&#39;t. Worth deciding which of those your reps actually need before you test anything.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Connectivity would be the biggest risk for me because it can derail the whole demo regardless of how good the configurator is. After that, touch usability matters most — if reps have to pinch, zoom, or fight tiny controls, the experience stops feeling polished fast.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 4

Strong demo advice, but the shortlist isn’t backed by real offline evidence. This reads more like “who might work” rather than “who has proven to work” in field conditions.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4