# What's the best event networking and matchmaking software for saving organizers time while maximizing attendee engagement?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey G2 community! </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here's what I found while <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/event-networking-and-matchmaking">researching event networking and matchmaking softwares</a>:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cvent-attendee-hub/reviews"><strong>Cvent Attendee Hub</strong></a> is my top pick for this one. It carries the highest G2 Score in the category, and reviewers back that up in their own words: one events coordinator called it "a great one-stop shop that saves time," and another pointed to its analytics for shaping attendee engagement year over year. The tradeoff is setup time; more than one reviewer said the backend takes real training to get comfortable with.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ringcentral-events/reviews"><strong>RingCentral Events</strong></a> had the single strongest quote I found on this exact tradeoff: a reviewer said the platform means "more time to focus on attendees instead of logistics," and that AI-generated clips post-event save real hours on follow-up content.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vfairs/reviews"><strong>vFairs</strong></a> and <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/airmeet-virtual-events-webinar-platform/reviews"><strong>Airmeet</strong></a> are both solid picks too. vFairs reviewers cite payment customization saving time even at 650+ attendees, and Airmeet reviewers credit its speed-networking format for engagement that "replicates the in-person event feel." Both had at least one reviewer wishing analytics or engagement went further.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Where's the actual time drain in your current process, setup, day-of moderation, or post-event reporting? That'll point you toward a different one of these four.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Saving organizer time and maximizing attendee engagement can pull in different directions, since the features that automate the organizer&#39;s workload aren&#39;t always the ones that get attendees to actually show up to a session.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 7 hours ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;I’d separate organizer time saved from attendee engagement and establish a baseline for both before choosing. A platform could automate reporting and moderation while engagement stays flat, or improve networking while adding significant setup work. The useful comparison is incremental engagement per organizer hour, because that exposes whether the extra controls are actually earning back the time they consume.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Post-event reporting would be the biggest time drain for me because it often means stitching together attendance, engagement, and follow-up data manually. A platform that automates that cleanly can save more time than one that only makes event setup faster.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 4

Worth noticing those two goals can quietly fight each other. The tools that maximize engagement often do it by giving organizers more levers to pull, which is the opposite of saving time. The ones that genuinely save time are opinionated and automate the defaults, which some organizers find limiting. Which are you actually short on, hours or engagement? If you&#39;re a small team drowning in setup, bias hard toward automation and accept fewer knobs. If engagement&#39;s flat, the time cost of a richer tool might be worth it.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4