# What's the best Customer Education platform to switch to when slow lab load times and limited customization are the problem?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">This one reads like it was written by someone mid-migration, and fair enough, because slow-loading labs and rigid, cookie-cutter environments are the exact two complaints that push teams to switch. Since it's squarely about lab tooling, here's what surfaced in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/customer-education">customer education</a> space on fast provisioning and flexibility:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/readytech/reviews"><strong>ReadyTech</strong></a> stands out for hosting flexibility, running labs on its own cloud, your AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud account, or in-house infrastructure, which is one way teams get load times and environments closer to what they need. Best for hosting control.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/heropa/reviews"><strong>Heropa</strong></a> provisions on demand and supports advanced networking and compute-heavy setups, so it fits when your labs are anything but generic. Best for complex, customizable environments.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cloudshare/reviews"><strong>CloudShare</strong></a> uses environment templates and quick reset for fast spin-up, though very customized environments still take planning to build. Best for template-driven speed.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/strigo/reviews"><strong>Strigo</strong></a> builds environments on the fly from templates rather than waiting on scripts, worth validating against your specific stack as a newer option. Best for quick template-based labs.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The realistic caveat is that every lab tool depends on a solid connection, and heavily customized environments take thought to build, so "fast" is partly the tool and partly how lean you keep the image. For anyone who already switched off a slow lab setup, what actually fixed the load times, the new vendor or a leaner environment?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The useful distinction is whether the platform improves provisioning speed without trading away the environment flexibility that caused the migration in the first place. I’d validate cold-start times using your actual lab image and networking requirements, not just vendor demo environments.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4