# What's the best buyer intent data provider for account-based marketing programs?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching what's the best buyer intent data provider for account-based marketing programs for a team moving from broad demand gen toward targeting named accounts. The distinction that matters for ABM specifically is whether the intent signal maps cleanly to an account list, not just a firmographic match. Here's what stood out in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/buyer-intent-data-providers">Buyer Intent Data Providers category on G2</a>.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/demandbase-one/reviews"><strong>Demandbase One</strong></a>. Built around account-based orchestration from the ground up, with intent as one input into a broader account scoring model. Best for teams running full ABM programs.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/6sense-revenue-marketing/reviews"><strong>6sense Revenue Marketing</strong></a>. Predictive intent scoring designed to surface accounts already in-market before they've filled out a form. Best for teams wanting predictive account scoring.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo/reviews"><strong>GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo</strong></a>. Combines intent signals with contact and company data in one workspace, useful when sales and marketing need the same account view. Best for teams wanting intent alongside contact data.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bombora-company-surge/reviews"><strong>Bombora Company Surge®</strong></a>. Pure-play intent data that plugs into other ABM platforms rather than being a full orchestration layer itself. Best for teams that already have an ABM platform and just need the intent feed.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/clearbit/reviews"><strong>Clearbit</strong></a>. Company and contact enrichment with intent-adjacent signals, often used to build and qualify the account list that intent data then scores. Best for building the target account list itself.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Worth being honest that intent data is only as useful as the account list it's matched against. A lot of ABM programs spend months tuning intent scoring before realizing their account list was too broad in the first place.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For marketers running ABM with intent data, which provider's signal actually correlated with closed deals, and which one produced a lot of noise that sales ignored?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 20 hours ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I’d want to separate signal coverage from signal usefulness here. A provider can surface a lot of “in-market” accounts, but that only helps ABM if sales actually acts on them. I’d be curious whether teams track acceptance or opportunity creation by intent source, because that seems like a cleaner test than simply measuring how many accounts get flagged.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 12 hours ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4