# What is the best way to handle document generation in Salesforce CRM without spending a fortune on add-ons that duplicate functionality you are already paying for?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Teams often pay for a <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/salesforce-crm-document-generation">Salesforce document generation</a> add-on that overlaps with something they already own, so I've been looking at how to do this without spending a fortune. The most cost-effective route is usually to stay native: tools like S-Docs, or capabilities you already have in your Salesforce stack, often cover the job without another subscription.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Before comparing products, I'd look at three questions:</p><ul>
<li>Can it generate documents inside Salesforce without another platform?</li>
<li>Does it include e-signatures, or will you need a separate signing subscription?</li>
<li>Will pricing still make sense as your team grows?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">With that in mind, a few that fit:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/s-docs/reviews"><strong>S-Docs</strong></a>: Best if minimizing software spend is the priority, since document generation and e-signatures both stay native to Salesforce. Reviewers mention switching to it from pricier tools purely for cost.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/formstack-documents/reviews"><strong>Formstack Documents</strong></a>: Good for workflow automation, but check pricing as your document volume or user count grows.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews"><strong>Conga Composer</strong></a>: Makes the most sense if you're already invested in the Conga ecosystem; otherwise it can be more capability (and cost) than a smaller team needs.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If your team only needs document generation and signatures, a deal-room platform like <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews"><strong>GetAccept</strong></a> may include buyer engagement features that don't justify the extra cost.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For most mid-size teams, I'd start by exhausting the capabilities already included in your Salesforce ecosystem before adding another document platform. How have you handled this? Did staying native actually save money, or did you end up needing a paid add-on anyway?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The template-count point is important, but I’d add maintenance ownership to the calculation. A native option that handles 80% of the workflow can still be cheaper if an admin can update templates, merge fields, and approval logic without professional services every time something changes. The hidden cost isn’t only the subscription. It’s how often routine document changes turn into implementation work.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;Most teams pay for something that duplicates Salesforce capabilities they already own. The real question before evaluating S-Docs or Conga is whether native capabilities or a Salesforce-bundled solution gets you 80% of the way there for free.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Before comparing add-ons it&#39;s worth counting how many document types you genuinely produce. Teams often find it&#39;s three templates that change twice a year, which is a very different purchase from generating bespoke contracts daily. Your native-first advice holds up best in the first case.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;It can work well for cost savings, though pricing structures may vary. Minimum user tiers and tier-based changes are worth factoring in before you commit.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4