# What is the best ETO ERP for an engineer-to-order manufacturer with complex product customization that needs a system built for that reality rather than adapted from discrete MRP?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I have been comparing ERP options for engineer-to-order manufacturers, and the thing that keeps tripping up the evaluation is this: most platforms were not actually designed for ETO. They were built around standard BOMs, repeating production runs, and stable SKU catalogs, and then configured to handle custom orders as a special case. If you have ever tried to track a job where every component is specific to that order, you know what happens when the software treats your whole operation as an exception.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">In the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/eto-erp">ETO ERP</a> category, the tools that reviewers from actual custom manufacturers describe as feeling native rather than adapted are Total ETO, IFS Cloud, and Infor SyteLine.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/total-eto/reviews"><strong>Total ETO</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Built from scratch for custom machine builders, system integrators, and OEMs. Reviewers from machinery and industrial automation companies describe project-based job tracking, BOM releases tied to CAD, real-time job costing, and an item master designed for components that vary by order rather than standard part numbers. One reviewer replaced "complicated and convoluted spreadsheets" across engineering, machine shop, and assembly with this single system.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ifs-cloud/reviews"><strong>IFS Cloud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Covers complex asset management, project-based production, and field service in one platform. Reviewers describe the modular architecture as letting teams start with what they need and expand without a rip-and-replace. The adaptability to specific business processes, rather than forcing the operation to match the software's assumptions, comes up in multiple reviews.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infor-syteline/reviews"><strong>Infor SyteLine</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Positioned specifically for ETO, make-to-order, and mixed-mode manufacturers. The event and workflow automation inside SyteLine is what reviewers describe as eliminating the multi-departmental delays that define ETO operations when the system cannot keep up with how work actually moves through the shop.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ecc/reviews"><strong>SAP ECC</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The integration depth across finance, production, and procurement is real, and the customization capability is extensive. Reviewers in complex manufacturing contexts describe the single source of truth across departments as genuinely transformative. Getting it to behave well for ETO specifically requires a serious implementation investment and ongoing support.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/epicor-kinetic/reviews"><strong>Kinetic</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Covers discrete, make-to-order, and engineer-to-order scenarios. Reviewers describe adding MRP, forecasting, and shop floor coordination over time as the business grew, without replacing the core platform.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For those who have gone through this evaluation, what was the clearest sign that a platform was really just a discrete MRP with ETO bolted on?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;There&#39;s a quick way to tell if a system is really built for ETO or just dressed up for it. Ask the demo person to buy material for a part that doesn&#39;t have a part number yet. In ETO that&#39;s normal life. You order steel while the design is still moving. Systems adapted from standard MRP choke on this, because everything in them hangs off the item master, so someone ends up creating fake part numbers just to keep the software happy. A system built for ETO treats the job, not the part number, as the center of the world. That one question in a demo will tell you more than the whole feature tour.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4