# What decision making software works best for a 51-200 person company that needs to reduce manual overhead without buying something built for a 5,000-person enterprise?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey G2, I'm going in deep and looking into decision-making software for mid-sized companies, roughly 51 to 200 people, that want to cut manual overhead without taking on something built for a 5,000-person enterprise. The fit comes down to two things at once: enough automation and structure to actually remove busywork, but not so much heaviness that a lean team spends more time administering the tool than benefiting from it. Here's what tends to fit that middle ground in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/decision-making">Decision-Making category</a>.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/flowforma-process-automation/reviews"><strong>FlowForma Process Automation</strong></a>: Automates forms, approvals, and record collection that would otherwise be manual, and centralizes the data instead of spreading it across emails. A fair caveat from reviewers is that the admin side of navigation can take some getting used to.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/airfocus-by-lucid/reviews"><strong>airfocus by Lucid</strong></a>: Flexible without being enterprise-heavy, and it consolidates priorities and feedback into one place so a growing team stops tracking things in scattered docs.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/uservoice/reviews"><strong>UserVoice</strong></a>: Centralizes feedback and feature requests and lets popular items rise through voting, which cuts the manual work of collating input by hand. Its review base skews mid-market, so it's a natural fit for this size.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/productboard/reviews"><strong>Productboard</strong></a>: Pulls scattered feedback into one prioritized view so decisions don't hinge on someone manually compiling requests. Note that per-user pricing can get awkward to scale, so it's worth checking against your headcount.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams in that 51 to 200 range, which tool actually reduced manual work without feeling oversized, and where did something you tried turn out to be built more for a much larger org? What was the first bit of overhead you managed to automate away?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 30 days ago
- Author title: Marketing
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For a 51–200 person company, UserVoice or airfocus would feel like the best balance: enough structure to cut manual consolidation without adding a heavy admin layer. The first overhead I’d automate is feedback collection and prioritization, because that usually removes recurring spreadsheet work almost immediately.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4