# What are the most reliable M&A software platforms based on reviews from long-term enterprise users?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m comparing M&amp;A platforms based on long-term enterprise reliability rather than initial ease of use.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/datasite-diligence/reviews"><strong>Datasite Diligence</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers cite recurring use, strong security, granular audit trails, and support for 17+ languages. Bulk uploads and frequent two-factor authentication can add friction.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/devensoft/reviews"><strong>Devensoft</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Eleven of 12 reviews come from enterprise users. Teams describe managing complex acquisitions and 200+ collaborators through one system.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/midaxo/reviews"><strong>Midaxo</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Supports the full deal lifecycle and has managed 5,000+ transactions representing over $1 trillion in value.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/dealroom/reviews"><strong>DealRoom</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Handles multiple deals and document workflows reliably, although reporting could improve.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Enterprise trust appears to depend on audit depth, integration breadth, and performance across repeated deal cycles.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which platform limitation only became visible after your usage scaled?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The limitation that tends to surface only at scale is the seam between the M&amp;amp;A platform and whatever data room providers are actually used for diligence, since a handful of deals a year hides that gap but running dozens doesn&#39;t. I&#39;ve noticed that exact pattern in reviews too: an enterprise VP of business development using Devensoft said integration with data room services could be better, meaning they still had to navigate different data room providers and then manually re-enter information into Devensoft or SharePoint for their own analysis. That manual bridge is invisible on deal one but turns into real overhead once volume climbs into the dozens per year.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4