# What are the best practices for evaluating and selecting UKG Marketplace solutions to support growing teams with complex HR and payroll requirements?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the HR and payroll leads who have rolled these out, not the vendors selling them.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What are your best practices for evaluating and selecting<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ukg-marketplace"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ukg-marketplace">UKG Marketplace</a> apps when HR and payroll needs get complex?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Ratings tell you who is liked, not what breaks in your setup. The checks reviewers wish they had run first:</p><ul>
<li>
<strong>Pressure-test the integration, not the demo.</strong> Confirm how data syncs back to UKG and how often. A clean UKG Pro integration like<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/atlantic-employee-screening/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/atlantic-employee-screening/reviews"><strong>Atlantic Employee Screening</strong></a>'s beats one that needs middleware.</li>
<li>
<strong>Run your messy HR and payroll cases first.</strong> Multi-state pay, overtime, off-cycle runs. If it only handles the clean path, you learn that at the worst time.</li>
<li>
<strong>Weigh vendor support as heavily as features.</strong> Reviews swing hard on responsiveness and onboarding, and that is what you live with after go-live.</li>
<li>
<strong>Check it scales without custom dev.</strong> No-code tools like<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews"><strong>Nintex</strong></a> age better than a one-off build you must maintain, though watch the licensing.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For those who have been through it, what is the one check you now refuse to skip, and which app taught you that the hard way?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Evaluating marketplace add-ons for something like UKG is really about checking how tightly each one actually integrates with core HR and payroll data, versus just sitting alongside it and requiring manual syncing.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;I’d add upgrade testing to the ownership point. An integration can work perfectly at go-live and still become a recurring problem when UKG or the app changes an API, field, or workflow. I’d want to know who validates those changes before production and whether payroll can keep running safely while an integration issue is being resolved.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;The check I’d never skip is testing real payroll edge cases end to end before signing. A smooth demo means very little if off-cycle runs, retro pay, or multi-state rules break the UKG sync once you’re live.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;Those are solid evaluation criteria. I&#39;d add one more: define ownership before go-live—who supports the integration, who fixes sync failures, and how upgrades are handled. Many long-term issues come from unclear operational ownership rather than missing features, especially as HR and payroll processes become more complex.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4