# What are the best Oil and Gas Back Office solutions for reducing manual data entry and improving financial reporting accuracy?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Manual data entry and reporting accuracy get pitched together constantly in <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oil-and-gas-back-office">Oil and Gas Back Office</a> conversations, but they're actually solved in different parts of the workflow: invoice intake versus report generation versus reconciliation.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/joltly-ap/reviews"><strong>Joltly AP</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Best known for AP automation, its single review reports an 80% cut in accounts payable workload. Has anyone else tried it and seen similar results, or is it still too new to tell?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/enverus-openinvoice/reviews"><strong>Enverus OpenInvoice</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Known for turning paper invoices digital in under a minute and catching mistakes before submission.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/petrofly/reviews"><strong>Petrofly</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Best suited for replacing spreadsheet-based royalty and JIB tracking entirely. Does that time savings hold up once a team scales past a handful of properties, or does manual review creep back in?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pandell-petronet/reviews"><strong>Pandell PetroNet</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Known for automatic report generation and contract-based sale splits that remove a manual reconciliation step each cycle.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/total-asset-manager/reviews"><strong>Total Asset Manager</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Best for consolidating data into a single warehouse, so figures don't need re-entry across departments. Does that single-source setup actually reduce entry errors, or just relocate where they happen?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams where AP invoice entry is the real bottleneck rather than royalty reporting, does a narrower tool like Joltly make more sense than a full production accounting platform?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Digging through the Oil and Gas Back Office category on G2, the real limiter is how thin the review evidence is. Joltly&#39;s headline rests on a single account, so I&#39;d treat it as a lead to verify rather than a pattern. On the actual question, matching the tool scope to where the manual work concentrates is the right move: if AP invoice intake is the bottleneck, a focused tool will beat a broad production-accounting suite at that one job. 

The catch is the handoff, because an AP tool only reduces total entry if its output flows cleanly into JIB, royalty, and reporting rather than getting re-keyed downstream, which is exactly where a narrow tool can quietly recreate the work it saved. So the narrow-versus-suite call really turns on integration: does the focused tool write into your production accounting system, or just move the data-entry step somewhere else?

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4